Lt Col Jon T. Hoffman, US Marine Corps Reserve. Official Study – War Department, Silk Chutes and Hard Fighting, USMC Parachute Units in World War II, History and Museums Division, Headquarters USMC – Washington DC – 1999

Foreword

This historical pamphlet covers the Marine Corps’ flirtation with airborne operations during World War II. In tracing this story, I relied heavily on the relevant operational and administrative records of the Marine Corps held by the National Archives in Washington, DC, and College Park, Maryland, and the Washington National Records Center in Suitland, Maryland. The various offices of the Marine Corps Historical Center yielded additional primary materials.
The Reference Section holds biographical data on most key individuals, as well as files on specific units. The Oral History Section has a number of pertinent interviews, the most significant being Gen Joseph C. Burger, Gen Marion L. Dawson, Gen Gerald C. Thomas, and Gen Robert H. Williams.

The Personal Papers Section has several collections pertaining to the parachute program. Among the most useful were the papers of Eldon C. Anderson, Eric Hammel, Nolen Marbrey, John C. McQueen, Peter Ortiz, and George R. Stallings. A number of secondary sources proved helpful. Marine Corps publications include Charles L. Updegraph, Jr’s US Marine Corps Special Units of World War II, Maj John L. Zimmerman’s Guadalcanal Campaign, Maj John N. Rentz’s Bougainville and the Northern Solomons, and Isolation of Rabaul by Henry I. Shaw, Jr and Maj Douglas T. Kane.
A valuable work on the overall American parachute program during the war is William B. Breuer’s Geronimo! The Marine Corps Gazette and Leatherneck contain a number of articles describing the parachute units and their campaigns. Ken Haney’s An Annotated Bibliography of USMC Paratroopers in World War II provides a detailed listing of sources, to include Haney’s own extensive list of publications on the subject.

Many Marine parachutists graciously provided interviews, news clippings, photographs, and other sources for this work. Col Dave E. Severance, secretary-treasurer of the Association of Survivors, was especially obliging in culling material from his extensive files. I would like to thank Benis M. Frank, former Chief Historian for the History and Museums Division, for his insightful advice and editing. Many members of the division staff ably assisted the research and production effort: Charles D. Melson, Chief Historian; Jack Shulimson and Charles R. Smith of the Writing Section; Evelyn A. Englander of the Library; Amy C. Cantin of Personal Papers; Ann A. Ferrante, Danny J. Crawford, and Robert V. Aquilina of Reference Section; Richard A. Long and David B. Crist of Oral History; Lena M. Kaljot of the Photographic Section; Frederick J. Graboske and Joyce Conyers-Hudson of the Archives Section; and Robert E. Struder, W. Stephen Hill, and Catherine A. Kerns of Editing and Design.

Jon T. Hoffman
Lt Col, US Marine Corps Reserve

Silk Chutes and Hard Fighting: US Marine Corps Parachute Units in World War II is a brief narrative of the development, deployment, and eventual demise of Marine parachute units during World War II. It is published to honor the veterans of these special units and for the information of those interested in Marine parachutists and the events in which they participated. Lt Col Jon T. Hoffman, USMC (R), is an infantry officer currently on duty as a staff officer with the Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Experimental. During his 15 years of active duty, he has served as platoon and company commander with 2nd Battalion 3rd Marines; inspector-instructor with 2nd Battalion 23rd Marines; history instructor at the US Naval Academy and action officer at Headquarters Marine Corps. His reserve service has been with the field history branch of the Marine Corps History and Museums Division, the II Marine Expeditionary Force Augmentation Command Element, and the adjunct faculty of the Marine Corps Command & Staff College. He is a distinguished graduate of the resident program of the latter institution. He also holds a bachelor’s degree from Miami University, a law degree from Duke University, and a master’s degree in military history from Ohio State University. His 1994 biography of Gen Merritt A. Edson, once A Legend, received the Marine Corps Historical Foundation’s Greene Award and was selected for the Commandant of the Marine Corps’ Reading List. His numerous articles in the professional military and historical journals have earned a dozen prizes, most notably the Marine Corps Historical Foundation’s Heinl Award for 1992, 1993, 1994, and 1995. In the interests of accuracy and objectivity, the History and Museums Division welcomes comments on this pamphlet from key participants, Marine Corps activities, and interested individuals.

Michael E. Monigan, Col USMC
Director of Marine Corps History and Museums

Parachute Troops for Military Forces

After their first successful operation jump in Stavanger-Sola during the German Campaign of Norway, on Apr 9, 1940, German Fallschirmjaeger spearheaded the German Army which had launched its offensive in western Europe by crossing the borders of neutral Holland, Belgium, and Luxembourg, Operation Fall Gelb (Plan Yellow). On May 10, 1940, by attacking through the Low Countries, the German Oberkommando der Wehrmacht believed that German forces could outflank the French Maginot Line and then advance through southern Belgium and northern France, cutting off the British Forces and a large number of French forces. This would force the French government to surrender.

To gain access to northern France, the invaders would have to defeat the armed forces of the Low Countries and either bypass or neutralize several defensive positions, primarily in Belgium and the Netherlands. Some of these defensive positions were only lightly defended and intended more as delaying positions than true defensive lines designed to stop an enemy attack.

However, some defenses were of a more permanent nature and possessed even considerable fortifications garrisoned by significant numbers of troops. The Grebbe-Peel Line in the Netherlands, which stretched from the southern shore of the Zuiderzee to the Belgian border near Weert, had a large number of fortifications combined with natural obstacles, such as marsh-lands and the Geld Valley, which could easily be flooded to impede an attack.

The main Belgian defensive line, the Line K-W, also known as the Dyle or Dijl Line, along the River Dyle, protected the port of Antwerp and the Belgian capital, Brussels. Between the K-W Line and the border was a delaying line along the Albert Canal. This delaying line was protected by forwarding positions manned by troops, except in a single area where the canal ran close to the Dutch border, which was known as the Maastricht Appendix due to the proximity of the Dutch city of Maastricht. There the Belgian military could not build forward positions due to the proximity of the border, and instead assigned an infantry division to guard the three bridges over the canal in the area, a brigade being assigned to each bridge. The bridges were defended by blockhouses equipped with machine-guns. Artillery support was provided by the Fort in Eben-Emael, whose artillery pieces covered two of the bridges. The German High Command became aware of the defensive plan, which called for Belgian forces to briefly hold the delaying positions along the Albert Canal and then retreat to link up with British and French forces on the K-W Line. The Germans developed a strategy that would disrupt this plan, by seizing the three bridges in the Maastricht Appendix, as well as other bridges in Belgium and the Netherlands. This would allow their own forces to breach the defensive positions and advance into the Netherlands.

At 0530, on the morning of May 10, 1940, German Luftwaffe Junkers Ju 52/3m towing DFS-230 type gliders carrying the men of the Sturmabteilung Koch (Assault Detachment Koch) were en route to the Fort in Eben-Emael. A couple of minutes before H Hour, 9 of the 11 DFS 230 gliders who had left Germany earlier swooped out of the dark sky and landed on a patch of ground that covered the roof of Gigantic Armored Fortress, one of the key position in the Liège Belt Defenses (Ceinture de Fortifications de Liège) in Belgium, along the Albert Canal. This part of the Fortification Belt had 3 major Fortresses in the defenses line of the Belgian Army: Fort Eben-Emael, Fort Battice and Fort Tancrémont.
The 60-odd men of a parachute-engineer detachment quickly debarked and set about their well-rehearsed work. Using newly developed shaped charges, they systematically destroyed the armored cupolas housing the fort’s artillery pieces and machine guns. Although Eben Emael’s 1200 defenders held out below ground for another 24 hours before surrendering, the fort had ceased to be a military obstacle. The paratroopers lost just six killed and 15 wounded. Simultaneously with this assault, a battalion of German parachute infantry seized two nearby bridges and prevented sentries from setting off demolition charges. These precursor operations allowed two Panzer-Divisions to cross the Meuse River on May 11 and collapse Belgium’s entire defensive line. Germany remaining five Fallschirmjaeger Battalions conducted similar missions in Holland and achieved substantial results. In the course of a few hours, 4500 Fallschirmjaeger had opened the road to an easy conquest of the Low Countries and laid the groundwork for Germany’s amazingly swift victory in the subsequent Battle of France. These stunning successes caused armed forces around the world to take stock of the role of parachutists in modern war.

The widely publicized airborne coup in the Low Countries created an immediate, high-level reaction within the Marine Corps. On May 14, the acting director of the Division of Plans and Policies at Headquarters Marine Corps issued a memorandum to his staff officers. The one-page document came right to the point in its first sentence: Gen Thomas Holcomb has ordered that we prepare plans for the employment of parachute troops. The matter was obviously of the highest priority since Col Pedro A. del Valle asked for immediate responses, which could be submitted in pencil on scrap paper. Perhaps as telling, the memorandum did not direct a mere study, but the creation of a course of action. Considering the Corps’ complete lack of expertise in this emerging field of warfare, HQs quickly translated staff plans into reality. The first small group of volunteers reported for training in Oct 1940 and graduated the following February. Succeeding classes went through an accelerated program for basic parachute qualification, but the numbers mounted very slowly.

Marine Parachute Pioneers
In October 1940, the Commandant sent a circular letter to all units and posts to solicit volunteers for the paratroopers. All applicants, with the exception of officers above the rank of captain, had to meet a number of requirements regarding age: 21 to 32 years; height: 66 to 74 inches and health: normal eyesight and blood pressure. In addition, they had to be unmarried, an indication of the expected hazards of the duty.

Applications were to include information on the Marine’s educational record and athletic experience, so Headquarters was obviously interested in placing above-average individuals in these new units. The letter further stated that personnel qualified as paratrooper would receive an unspecified amount of extra pay. The money served as both a recognition of the danger and an incentive to volunteer. Congress would eventually set the additional monthly pay for parachutists at $100 for officers and $50 for enlisted men. Since a private first class at that time earned about $36 per month and a second lieutenant $125, the increase amounted to a hefty bonus. It would prove to be a significant factor in attracting volunteers, though parachuting would have generated a lot of interest without the money. As one early applicant later put it, based on common knowledge of the German success in the Low Countries, many Marines thought that this was going to be a grand and glorious business. Parachute duty promised plenty of action and the chance to get in on the ground floor of a revolutionary type of warfare.

To get the program underway, the Commandant transferred Marine Capt Marion L. Dawson from duty with the Navy’s Bureau of Aeronautics to Lakehurst, New Jersey, to oversee the new school. Two enlisted Marine parachute riggers would serve as his initial assistants. Marine parachuting got off to an inauspicious start when Capt Dawson and two lieutenants made a visit to Hightstown, New Jersey, to check out the jumping towers (Safe Parachute Manufacturing Company). The other officers, Lt Walter S. Osipoff and Lt Robert C. McDonough, were slated to head the Corps’ first group of parachute trainees. After watching a brief demonstration, the owner suggested that the Marines give it a test. As Dawson later recalled, he reluctantly agreed, only to break his leg when he landed at the end of his free fall.

On Oct 26, 1940, Osipoff, McDonough, and 38 enlisted men reported to Lakehurst. The Corps was still developing its training program, so the initial class spent 10 days at Hightstown starting on Oct 28. Immediately after that they joined a new class at the Parachute Material School and followed that 16-week course of instruction until its completion on Feb 27, 1941. A Douglas R3D-2 transport plane arrived from Quantico on Dec 6 and remained there through Dec 21, so the pioneer Marine paratroopers made their first jumps during this period. For the remainder of the course, they leap from Navy blimps stationed at Lakehurst. Lt Osipoff, the senior officer, had the honor of making the first jump by a Marine paratrooper. By graduation, each man had completed the requisite 10 jumps to qualify as a parachutist and parachute rigger.

Not all made it through. Several dropped from the program due to ineptitude or injury. The majority of these first graduates were destined to remain at Lakehurst as instructors or to serve the units in the Fleet Marine Force as riggers. By the time the second training class reported, Dawson and his growing staff had created a syllabus for the program. The first two weeks were ground school, which emphasized conditioning, wearing of the harness, landing techniques, dealing with wind drag of the parachute once on the ground, jumping from platforms and a plane mock-up, and packing chutes. Students spent the third week riding a bus each day to Hightstown where they applied their skills on the towers. The final two weeks consisted of work from aircraft and tactical training as time permitted. Students had to complete six jumps to qualify as a parachutist. The trainers had accumulated their knowledge from the Navy staff, from observing Army training at Fort Benning, and from a film depicting German parachutists. The latter resulted in one significant Marine departure from US Army methods. Whereas the Army made a vertical exit from the aircraft, basically just stepping out the door, Marines copied the technique depicted in the German film and tried to make a near-perpendicular dive, somewhat like a swimmer coming off the starting block.

Marine paratroopers used two parachutes in training and in tactical jumps. They wore the main chute in a backpack configuration and a reserve chute on their chest. When jumping from transport planes, the main opened by means of a static line attached to a cable running lengthwise in the cargo compartment.

Once the jumpmaster gave the signal, a man crouched in the doorway, made his exit dive, and then drew his knees toward his chest. The parachutist, arms wrapped tightly about his chest chute, felt the opening shock of his main canopy almost immediately upon leaving the plane. If not, he had to pull the ripcord to deploy the reserve chute. (When jumping from blimps, the parachutists had to use a ripcord for the main chute, too.)

A parachutist’s speed of descent depended upon his weight, so Marines carried as little as possible to keep the rate down near 16 feet per second, the equivalent of jumping from a height of about 10 feet. At that speed, a jumper had to fall and roll when hitting the ground so as to spread the shock beyond his leg joints. Training jumps began at 1000 feet, while the standard height for tactical jumps in the Corps was 750. The Germans jumped from as low as 300 feet, but that made it impossible to open the emergency chute in time for it to be effective, which is probably the reason why they never used an emergency ‘reserve’ parachute.

Throughout 1941 the Marine Corps produced just a trickle of jumpers and remained a long way from possessing a useful tactical entity. Most members of the first three training classes reported to the 2nd Marine Division in San Diego, to form the nucleus of the Corps’ first parachute unit. The 2nd Parachute Company (soon re-designated Able Co, 2nd Parachute Battalion) formally came into existence on Mar 22, 1941. The first commanding officer was Capt Robert H. Williams.

The majority of the fourth class went to Quantico, Va, and became the nucleus of Able Co, 1st Parachute Battalion, on May 28. Its first commanding officer was Capt Marcellus J. Howard. From that point forward, graduating classes were generally detailed on an alternating basis to each coast.

In the summer of 1941, the West Coast company transferred to Quantico and merged into the 1st Battalion. Williams assumed command of the two-company organization. The concentration of the Corps’ small paratrooper contingents at Quantico at least allowed them to begin a semblance of tactical training. The battalion conducted a number of formation jumps during the last half of July, some from Marine planes and others from Navy patrol bombers. In no case could it muster enough planes to jump an entire company at once. Capt Williams used his battalion’s time on the ground to emphasize his belief that paratroopers are simply a new form of infantry. His men learned hand-to-hand fighting skills, went on conditioning hikes, and did a lot of calisthenic exercises. A Time magazine reporter noted that the parachutists were a notably tough-looking outfit among Marines, who all look tough.

One of the battalion’s July jumps demonstrated the consternation that paratroopers could instill by their surprise appearance on a battlefield. A landing at an airfield near Fredericksburg, Va, unexpectedly disrupted maneuvers of the Army’s 44-ID, because its leaders thought the Marines were an aggressor force added to the problem without their knowledge. The same jump also indicated some of the limitations of airborne operations. An approaching thunderstorm brought high winds that blew many of the jumpers away from their designated landing site and into a grove of trees. Luckily, none of the 40 men involved sustained any serious injuries.

Overseas Models
Italy and the Soviet Union were among the first to demonstrate the military possibilities of airborne infantry in the 1930s with a series of maneuvers held in 1935 and 1936. Though somewhat crude, in fact, the Soviet paratroopers had to exit their slow-moving Tupolev TB-3 transporters through a hatch in the roof and then position themselves along with the wings to jump together, the exercise managed to land 1000 troops through air-drops followed by another 2500 soldiers with heavy equipment delivered via air landings. The gathered forces proceeded to carry out conventional infantry attacks with the support of heavy machine guns and light artillery. It is interesting to note that among the foreign observers present was Hermann Göring.

Beginning in the mid-1930s, several other European nations followed suit. Germany launched a particularly aggressive program, placing it in the air force under the command of a former World War One pilot, Kurt Student.

The German paratroopers (Fallschirmjaeger) were complemented by glider units, an outgrowth of the sport gliding program that develops flying skills while Germany was under Versaille’s Treaty restrictions on rearmament. In 1940 Hitler had about 4500 Fallschirmjaeger at his disposal, organized into six battalions. Another 12.000 men formed an air infantry division designed as an air-landed follow-up to a parachute assault. The Luftwaffe (Air Force) had also a force of 700 Ju-52 transport planes available to carry these troops into combat. Each Junker-52 could hold up to 15 men with arms and ammunitions.

The Soviet Union made the first combat use of parachute forces during the Winter War in Finland. At the beginning of the month of Dec 1939, as part of its initial abortive invasion, the Red Army dropped several dozen paratroopers near Petsamo behind the opposing lines. Apparently, Soviet paratroopers landed also, with machine guns, on the Karelian Isthmus, in the vicinity of Vilmannstrand about 70 km north-west of Viborg. The Red Army group of about 100 paratroopers were either killed or captured. Another report mentions a group of 200 Red Army paratrooper landing along the Finish-Norwegian border, at Salminarji in the nickel mountains of northern Finland. After a short skirmish, all the members of this group were also killed or captured. Every Red Army tentatives to drop paratroopers in Finland met equally disastrous fates.

Germany’s first use of airborne forces did not really achieve favorable results. In April 1940, as part of the invasion of Norway and Denmark, the Luftwaffe assigned a battalion of paratroopers to seize several key installations. The first group of Fallschirmjaeger captured the defended airbase of Sola, near Stavanger. The second group, an entire company, encountered its first defeat during the Norwegian Campaign. The paratroopers were dropped around the village and the railroad junction of Dombås on Apr 14, 1940, and after a five-day battle, the force was destroyed.

During the German invasion of Poland in 1939, German Fallschirmjaeger were sent to occupy several airfields between the Vistula and Bug rivers. Although these operations were critical to German success in the campaign, they received little attention at the time, perhaps due to the much larger and bloodier naval battles that occurred along the Norwegian coast. German airborne forces achieved spectacular success just one month later. One battalion breached Belgium’s heavily fortified defensive line during the offensive of May 1940.

Four battalions reinforced by two air infantry regiments captured three Dutch airfields, plus several bridges over rivers that bisected the German route of approach to the Hague, Holland’s capital, and Rotterdam, its principal port. In each case, the airborne units held their ground until the main assault forces arrived overland. The final parachute battalion, supported by two regiments of air infantry, landed near the Hague with the mission of decapitating the Dutch government and military high command. This force failed to achieve its goals but did cause considerable disruption. The last major German use of parachute assault came in May 1941. In the face of Allied control of the sea, Hitler launched an airborne invasion of the Mediterranean island of Crete. The objective was to capture three airfields for the ensuing arrival of air landed reinforcements. Casualties were heavy among the first waves of 3000 men landed by parachute and glider, but others continued to pour in. Despite an overwhelming superiority in numbers, the 42.000 Allied defenders did not press their initial advantage.

Late in the second day, the Germans began landing transports on the one airstrip they held, even though it was under Allied artillery fire. After a few more days of bitter fighting, the Allied commander concluded that he was defeated and began to withdraw by sea. In the course of the battle, the Germans suffered 6700 casualties, half of them dead, out of a total force of 25.000. Allied losses on the island were less than 3500, although an additional 11.800 troops surrendered and another 800 soldiers died or were wounded at sea during the withdrawal.
The Allies decided that airborne operations were a powerful tactic, inasmuch as the Germans had leapfrogged 100 miles of British-controlled waters to seize Crete from a numerically superior ground force. As a consequence, the US and British armies would invest heavily in creating parachute and glider units. Hitler reached the opposite conclusion. Having lost 350 aircraft and nearly half of the 13.000 paratroopers engaged, he determined that airborne assaults were a costly tactic whose time had passed. The Germans never again launched a large operation from the air.
The first tactical employment of Marine parachutists came with the large-scale landing exercise of the Amphibious Force, Atlantic Fleet, in August 1941. This corps, under the command of Gen Holland M. Smith, consisted of the 1st Marine Division and the Army’s 1st Infantry Division. The final plan for the exercise at New River, North Carolina, called for Capt Williams’ company to parachute at H+1 onto a vital crossroads behind enemy lines, secure it, and then attack the rear of enemy forces opposing the landing of the 1st Infantry Division.

Capt Howard’s company would jump on the morning of D+2 in support of an amphibious landing by Col Merritt A. Edson’s Mobile Landing Group and a Marine tank company. Edson’s force (the genesis of the 1st Raider Battalion) would go ashore behind enemy lines, advance inland, destroy the opposing reserve force, and seize control of important lines of communication. Howard’s men would land near Edson’s objective and secure the road net and bridges in that vicinity. For the exercise, the parachutists were attached to the 1st Marine Aircraft Wing, which operated from a small airfield at New Bern, North Carolina, just north of the Marine base. The landing force executed the operation as planned, but Holland Smith was not pleased with the results because there was far too many artificialities, including the lack of an aggressor force. A shortage of transport planes (only two on hand) handicapped the paratroopers; it took several flights, with long delays between, to get just one of the under-strength companies on the ground. Once the exercise was underway, Smith made one attempt to simulate an enemy force. He arranged for Capt Williams to re-embark one squad and jump behind the lines of the two divisions, with orders to create as much havoc as possible. Williams’ tiny force cut tactical telephone lines, hijacked trucks, blocked a road, and successfully evaded capture for several hours.

One after-action report noted that the introduction of paratroops lent realism to the necessity for command post-security. Smith put great faith in the potential value of airborne operations. In his preliminary report on the exercise, he referred to Edson’s infantry-tank-parachute assault on D 2 as a spearhead thrust around the hostile flank and emphasized the need in modern warfare for the speed and shock effect of airborne and armor units.

With that in mind, he recommended that his two-division force include at least one air attack brigade of at least one parachute regiment and one air infantry regiment. (The term ‘air infantry’ referred to ground troops landed by transport aircraft – Glider). He also urged the Marine Corps to acquire the necessary transport planes. Despite this high-level plea, the Marine Corps continued to go slowly with the parachute program.
At the end of March 1942, the 1st Battalion finally stood up its third line company, but the entire organization only had a total of 332 officers and men, less than 60 percent of its table of organization strength (one of the lowest figures in the division). The 2d Battalion, still recovering from the loss of its first Able Co, had barely 200 men.
Manpower and aircraft shortages and the straight jacket of the parachute training pipeline accounted for some of the bottlenecks, but a lack of enthusiasm for the idea at Headquarters also appears to have taken hold. By contrast, the Corps had not conceived the original idea for the raiders until mid-1941, but it had two full 800-man battalions in existence by March 1942.

The Marine Corps was not enthusiastic about the latter force, either, but it expanded rapidly in large measure due to pressure from President Roosevelt and senior Navy leaders. Without similar heat from above, Headquarters was not about to commit its precious resources to a crash program to expand the paratroopers and provide them with air transports. Marine planners probably made a real choice in the matter, given the competing requirements to fill up divisions and air wings and make them ready for amphibious warfare, another infant art suffering through even greater growing pains.

Marine Corps Airborne Doctrine
On May 15, 1940, the Commandant, Gen Thomas Holcomb, wrote the Chief of Naval Operations to seek the help of his naval attaches in gathering information on foreign parachute programs. He noted that he was intensely interested in the subject. The Berlin attaché responded the following month with a lead on how to obtain news-reels and an educational film on the German paratroopers. The London attaché eventually provided additional information on the Germans and on Britain’s fledgling parachute program launched in June 1940. The Commandant’s own intelligence section had already compiled available material on the German and Soviet forces.

The report noted the distinction between parachutists and air infantry, the latter consisting of specially organized units trained and equipped to move by transport aircraft. The paratroopers acted as the advance guard for the air infantry by seizing the airfields upon which the transports would land. The report also detailed the different methods that the Germans and Soviets used to train their respective forces. German paratrooper recruits went through an intensive ground school prior to making the six jumps required to achieve membership in a unit. The Soviet program featured the use of towers for practice jumps prior to actual training with a plane. When staff officers at Headquarters first looked at parachute forces in the aftermath of Fort Eben Emael in Belgium, they specifically considered the functions such a unit would perform. Their ideas were generally similar: paratroopers would be valuable for raids; for reconnaissance; for the seizure of airfields; for the aerial envelopment of the enemy’s rear area and, finally, for the occupation of key terrain in advance of the main force. Several officers specifically tied the latter two missions to the conduct of amphibious operations. Although the Corps’ amphibious doctrine had existed on paper for several years, the Fleet Marine Force was having a difficult time turning those ideas into reality.
During annual exercises, a lack of decent landing craft and transports had prevented the rapid buildup ashore of combat power, something the amphibious force had to do if it hoped to defeat counterattacks against its beachhead. Brig Gen Holland M. Smith, commander of the 1st Marine Brigade, first tried to solve this problem during Fleet Exercise 6 in February 1940. A key part of his plan was the night landing of one company three hours prior to the main amphibious assault. This company, embarked in a fast destroyer transport, would go ashore by rubber boat, seize key terrain overlooking the proposed beachhead, and then protect the rest of the force as it landed and got itself organized. This idea eventually gave birth to the 1st Marine Raider Battalion.

In the spring of 1940, it was obvious to a number of Marine officers, at Headquarters and in the FMF, that parachutism now constituted an ideal alternative for speedily seizing a surprise lodgment on an enemy coast. Smith explicitly would advocate that new wrinkle to doctrine the following year. The Marine Corps did not develop formal airborne doctrine until late 1942. It came in the form of a 12-page manual titled Parachute and Air Troops. Its authors believed that airborne forces could constitute a paralyzing application of power in the initial phase of a landing attack. Secondarily, parachute troops could seize critical points, such as airfields or bridges, or they could operate behind enemy lines in small groups to gather intelligence or conduct sabotage operations.

The doctrinal publication did not provide much detail on tactics, but the parachutists worked out techniques in combination with Marine transport pilots. The standard method of operations called for a terrain-hugging approach flight at altitudes as low as 50 feet, with a last-minute ascent to several hundred feet, at which point the jumpers exited the aircraft. The doctrine noted the limitations of airborne assault and emphasized that these forces could only seize small objectives and hold them for a short time pending linkup with seaborne or overland echelons. The manual envisioned the formation of an air brigade composed of one regiment each of paratroops and air infantry, the type of force originally sought by Holland Smith. All leaders were thoroughly briefed beforehand with maps, aerial photos, and a sand table mockup of the objective so that they could quickly get organized and oriented once they hit the ground. When they jumped, the paratroopers carried the collapsible Johnson weapons or the Reisings, along with basic individual items such as a belt, knife, canteens, and ammunition. Cargo parachutes delivered heavier weapons and supplies.

From early in the life of the program, planners realized that a lack of training facilities and planes hampered the ability of the Corps to field an adequate airborne force. They thus began looking at using parachutists for secondary missions. In April 1941 the Commandant directed that parachute units conduct training in rubber boat operations, reconnaissance, demolitions, and other subjects to enable them to conduct special missions requiring only small forces or not necessarily involving airborne insertion. On New Caledonia in 1943, the 1st Parachute Regiment devoted much of its training time to such skills. In many respects, the Marine Corps had molded the parachutists and raiders into carbon copies of each other, with the parachutists’ unique ability to enter battle being the only significant difference between the two special units.

Air Transport
The fate of the parachute program was intertwined completely with Marine aviation, inasmuch as the airborne infantry could not fulfill its function without transport aircraft. Although men could jump from just about any type of plane, tactical parachute operations required certain characteristics in aircraft. The door had to allow easy exit and the interior freedom of movement so that a stick of jumpers could exit the plane in short order; the ideal was one second per man. Any increase in the delay between jumpers resulted in wide dispersion once the stick landed on the ground and that translated into extra time spent in finding weapons and getting organized to fight. The last parachutists also might find themselves landing outside the drop zone in woods or water, either of which could easily result in death or serious injury.

When Headquarters planners first began evaluating the idea of creating Marine parachute units, the Corps possessed just two planes suitable for tactical jumping, the pair of Douglas R2D-1s (Military version of the DC-2) of Utility Squadron 1 (VMJ-1) in Quantico, Va. Its two Wright engines generated 710 horsepower, lifted the plane’s maximum gross weight of 18.200 pounds, and pushed it to a top speed of 210 miles per hour. It could accommodate approximately 10 parachutists. (The capacity depended, of course, upon the amount of equipment to be dropped, since each cargo parachute for weapons and supplies took up the space of one man). At that time the Department of the Navy had on order seven of Douglas’ newer DC-5s, known as R3D-2s in the naval services.
The Marine Corps was slated to receive four of these aircraft, which could hold about 15 jumpers. Finally, the Corps had its R3D-2s by mid-1941 and placed two each in VMJ-252 and 152, respectively located in Hawaii and Quantico. One of the old R2D-1s remained in service at the air station in San Diego.

The real workhorse of Allied airborne operations during World War II was based on Douglas’ DC-3 airliner, which made its first commercial flight in 1935. The Army Air Forces began buying a military version in 1940 and labeled it the C-47. The Department of the Navy acquired its first planes of this type, designated the R4D, during 1942. The Skytrain’s two Pratt and Whitney engines generated 1200 horsepower, lifted the plane’s gross weight of 29.000 pounds, and pushed it to a top speed of 227 miles per hour. It could carry up to 25 paratroopers out to a range of 1600 miles.

The United States built over 10.000 C-47 variants during the war, with the naval services receiving 568 of them. In August 1943 the Marine Corps possessed about 80 of these planes. There were seven VMJ squadrons and an eighth on the drawing board, each with a projected authorization of one dozen R4Ds, but most of the units were brand new and still short of planes and crews. A number of the aircraft also were distributed in ones or twos to headquarters squadrons in support of various air groups. The heart of Marine transport capability rested at that point in Marine Air Group 25’s three squadrons in the South Pacific, a grand total of just 36 transports.

Training Centers
Very early in the process of creating the parachute program, the Marine Corps sought out information on the parachute tower then being used as an amusement ride at the New York City World’s Fair. A lieutenant with the Marine Detachment at the fair provided his report on May 20, 1940. He thought such a tower could be used to advantage if the Corps modified it to simulate the physical jolt that a jumper would experience when his parachute opened and radically slowed his rate of descent. The Safe Parachute Company, the builder of the World’s Fair ride, also owned two towers at Hightstown, New Jersey. Each stood 150 feet tall and used a large ring to lift a spread parachute with the jumper dangling from the risers. When the mechanism released its load, the descending chute automatically filled with air. One tower featured a controlled descent guided by four cables, while the other completely released the parachute for a free fall. Fortuitously, Hightstown was just 20 miles from the Navy’s Parachute Material School at Naval Air Station Lakehurst, New Jersey, the facility that trained sailors and a handful of Marines to pack parachutes for pilots. That made Lakehurst the obvious choice as the primary instruction facility. Lakehurst eventually had room to train a maximum of 100 men at a time. Given the length of the course (which often stretched to six weeks or more due to delays for weather), the Marine Corps thus could produce no more than 700 qualified parachutists per year.

By mid-1941 the school was not even achieving that pace, having fallen more than two months behind schedule. In July 1941, the officer in charge of the school recommended the creation of an additional parachute training facility at the burgeoning Marine base in New River, North Carolina, but it would be a while before the Corps found the resources to act on that suggestion. In the meantime, Headquarters decided to shift its primary parachute school to San Diego to allow more efficient use of training time due to better weather and the proximity of Marine aviation units.

In April 1942 the Lakehurst detachment began transferring its instructors to San Diego, a process completed in May after the last Lakehurst class graduated. The new San Diego school began training its first class on May 27. The plan called for the program to start a new class of 36 students each week, with a possible expansion to 60 trainees per week in the future. The school initially operated out of San Diego’s Camp Elliott, but the Corps built barracks, jump towers, plane mockups, and aviation fields near Santee and moved the entire operation there at the end of August 1942.

The Commandant named this small base, dedicated entirely to parachute training, Camp Gillespie in honor of Brevet Maj Archibald H. Gillespie, who had participated in the campaign to free California from Mexico in 1846.

The Marine Corps established another training facility at New River’s Hadnot Point during 1942. In June the 1st Parachute Batallion had transferred one officer and 13 NCOs to form the instructor cadre. The school opened with the first class of 54 students on Aug 10, but delays in constructing the jump towers and obtaining parachutes slowed training. The initial group finally graduated on Oct 13. The New River school’s designed capacity was 75/class, with a new class beginning every week. By the end of 1942, the Marine parachute program was finally in full swing and capable of producing 135 new jumpers per week, though actual numbers were never that high. The Marine Corps had one more source of trained parachutists. During the 1st Battalion’s initial period of recuperation from fighting on Gavutu and Guadalcanal, it had difficulty obtaining qualified jumpers from the States. To solve the problem, Col Williams organized his own informal school. It lacked towers and he ignored much of the syllabus used stateside, but during the program’s brief operation it produced about 100 trained jumpers from volunteers garnered from other units located in New Caledonia.


Tables of Organization (TO&E)
When the Plans and Policies Division at Headquarters made its initial request in May 1940 for input on a Marine parachute program, it suggested that planners work with an organization for one infantry battalion reinforced by a platoon of pack howitzers and some light antiaircraft and anti-tank weapons. In late October 1940, the Commandant determined that each infantry regiment would train one of its battalions as air infantry, with one company of each such battalion prepared to conduct parachute operations. He estimated that would require 750 parachutists, about the number originally envisioned for a separate battalion. However, those men would now double as regular infantry and help fill spaces in the chronically undermanned line units. That idea did not last long and the Corps soon began talking about multiple battalions specializing in parachute operations.

The first official parachute table of organization, issued in Mar 1941, authorized a battalion of three-line companies and a headquarters unit. The line companies consisted of a weapons platoon (three 60-MM mortars and three light machine guns), three rifle platoons of three 10-man squads (armed with six rifles, two Browning Automatic Rifles (BARs), and two Thompson submachine guns).

The standard squad for the regular infantry unit at the time was nine men, with eight rifles and a single BAR. The 34 officers and 832 enlisted men of an infantry battalion dwarfed the 24 officers and 508 enlisted men of a parachute battalion, with the main difference coming from the former’s company of heavy weapons. The parachutists lacked the large-caliber mortars, water-cooled machine guns, and antitank guns possessed by the infantry, but made up for it in part with a much greater preponderance of individual automatic weapons.

Once the US entered the war, the parachute units went through the same process of experimentation in structure as the rest of the Corps. A 1942 revision to the tables did away with the weapons platoons, distributing one 60-MM mortar to each rifle platoon and getting rid of the machine-guns. The latter change was not as drastic as it might appear since each rifle squad was to have three Johnson light machine-guns. The remaining riflemen were supposed to carry Reising submachine guns. This mix of automatic weapons theoretically gave the parachute squad an immense amount of firepower. As things turned out, the Johnson took a long time to get to the forces in the field and the Reising proved to be an unreliable weapon.

The 1943 tables created a regimental structure consisting of a headquarters company and a weapons company. The latter unit of seven officers and 172 men served as a pool of extra firepower for the lightly armed battalions. The company was supposed to field four 81-MM mortars, one dozen each of the air-cooled and water-cooled .30-caliber machine-guns, two .50-caliber machine-guns, two bazookas, and eight grenade launchers. Headquarters also authorized a change in the size of the battalions from 24 officers and 508 enlisted Marines to 23 officers and 568 enlisted. The additional personnel was all in the headquarters company, though 33 of them formed a demolitions platoon that did add directly to the battalion’s combat power. Beyond that, I MAC allowed the line companies to reestablish weapons platoons exactly like those deleted in 1942. That move increased the authorized strength of each battalion by another three officers and 87 enlisted men (though manpower for these units was often taken out of hiding). The new rifle squad of 11 men was supposed to have three Johnson machine guns, three Johnson rifles, and five Reisings, but by this time the parachute regiment informally had adopted the fireteam concept of three three-man teams and a squad leader.

Military Accidents
Since the end of World War Two, everything has been done to tow special troops under the projectors and make peoples believe that only these troops were having a very dangerous preparation to achieve their goals, being a Pilot, a Paratroopers, a Marine Raider and so on. I have compiled a small list of Military Naval accidents that happened during training sessions or during combat without being the result of enemy action. While typing this archive I thought that citing all these long-forgotten names would be a perfect way to remember them!

1940, 40 sailors were killed in flight accidents during the year. On Jan 31, 1940, on the USS New York (BB-34), Seaman 2 class James Orville Epperson was accidentally struck by loading tray inside #2 turret and fell into the gun pit. Epperson was then crushed by a 14-inch shell that fell in immediately afterward. While en route from San Diego to Pensacola on Jan 2, 1940, one PBY-5 aircraft encountered severe weather over Texas and 5-members of the crew were forced to bail out. One parachute failed and Aviation Machinist’s Mate 2 class William F. Percich fell to his death. On Jan 4, 1940, a twin-engine transport plane Douglas R2D-1, which had rescued four crewmen who had bailed out of the PBY on Jan 2, crashed and burned while trying to land at San Diego. Four officers and three enlisted men of the R2D-1 and the four PBY crew all died in the crash.

During the year of 1941, 110 sailors were killed in-flight accidents. On Jun 18, on board the USS California (BB-44) Seaman 2 class Norris Rabelee Wilson died of injuries suffered on the shell deck of the #4 turret when he was caught between rotating part of that turret and a secured service shell. Jun 19, the USS O-9 (SS-70) submarine got lost during a deep submergence test off New London, CT. The crew, 33 men, drowned. On Aug 14, the submarine chaser USS PC-457 sank after colliding with the merchant ship SS Norluna north of San Juan, Puerto Rico. Fireman 2 class Francis Carl McKenna, USNR, and Seaman 1 class Howard Dorsey Osborn, USNR, were both killed.

Between Dec 7, 1941, (Pearl Harbor) and Dec 29, 1946, 1469 enlisted men were killed in air combat. If 460 were killed in action on the ground, 3303 enlisted men were killed in-flight accidents. On Jan 24, 1942, the USS S-26 (SS-131) accidentally rammed and sunk by PC-460. 46 men were killed.
Six days before, on Jan 18, the USS Truxtun (DD-229) and the USS Pollux (AKS-2) ran aground during a storm in Placentia Bay, Newfoundland, and broke up in the surf. 204 men were killed. On Jun 12, 1943, the USS R-12 (SS-89) sank after flooding in the batteries compartment, taking 42 men of the crew to the bottom of the sea.

On Sep 2, 1943, a TBF Avenger splashed on takeoff from the USS Belleau Wood (CVL-24) in the eastern Pacific. The radioman was killed when the depth charge activated and exploded. On Oct 6, an F6F Hellcat crashed on the deck of USS Belleau Wood (CVL-24) during the Wake Island raid, fire and explosion killed 4 flight deck crew. A little later, on Oct 16, the USS Moonstone (PYc-9) was lost after a collision with the USS Greer (DD-145). 1 man was killed. On Nov 20, the USS Mississippi (BB-41), while in combat operations off Makin in the Gilbert Islands, suffered a cordite explosion in the #2 14-inch gun turret. 19 men were injured and 43 killed. Three days after the new year, on Jan 3, 1944, suffering a series of ammunition explosions, the USS Turner (DD-648) sank in the New York harbor. 138 men killed and 60 injured.

On Jan 13, 1944, an F6F Hellcat crashed through the barrier on the flight deck of the USS Bataan (CVL-29) during one training operation en route to Trinidad. 3 flight deck crew killed. An accidental ordnance blast on the LST-353 sets off cataclysmic ammunition explosions at West Loch, Pearl Harbor. Six tank landing ships (LST-39, LST-43, LST-69, LST-179, LST-353, LST-480), three tank landing craft (LCT-961, LCT-963, LCT-983), and 17 track landing vehicles (LVTs) were destroyed in these explosions and fires. 163 men were killed and 396 injured. On Jul 17, again an ammunition explosion on Pier #1 at the US Naval Magazine, in Port Chicago CA. The tremendous blast killed 1 Marine, 5 Coast Guard and 73 civilians, 390 others were also injured including 233 African-American Navy personnel.

On Aug 12, Lt Joseph P. Kennedy, the older brother of John F. Kennedy, was killed with his co-pilot in a mid-air explosion after taking off from England in a PB4Y from Special Attack Unit One (SAU-1). Following manual takeoff, they were supposed to parachute out over the English Channel while the radio-controlled explosive-filled drone proceeded to attack a German V-2 missile-launching site. Possible causes include faulty wiring or FM signals from a nearby transmitter. The USS Warrington (DD-383) sank on Sep 13, 1944, during a hurricane off Florida. 248 men drowned. Nov 10, 1944, the USS Mount Hood (AE-11), with a cargo of 3800 tons of ordnance, suddenly exploded in Seeadler Harbor, Admiralty Islands, creating a mushroom cloud that rose 7000 feet into the air.

The tremendous explosion ripped a 300 foot long, 50 foot wide, and 40-foot deep crater into the ocean floor. Metal fragments caused many casualties and severe damage to nearby ships and twenty-two small boats and landing craft were sunk, destroyed, or damaged beyond repair. Casualties included 45 known dead, 327 missing, and 371 injured. The only survivors of Mount Hood’s 318-man crew were a shore party of 18 sailors who saw a flash from the harbor followed by two quick explosions.

Dec 18, 1944, two days after the beginning of the Battle of the Bulge in Belgium, Task Force 38 was struck by a typhoon off the Philippines. The destroyers USS Hull (DD-350), the USS Spence (DD-512), and the USS Monaghan (DD-354) capsized and sank. 28 other vessels were damaged and about 790 men were killed. 80 others were injured. On Jan 24, 1945, the USS Extractor (ARS-15) was torpedoed and sank by the USS Guardfish (SS-217) in case of mistaken identification. 6 men were killed. On Jun 5, 1945, Task Force 38 was again struck by a typhoon in the Okinawa area. 36 ships were damaged and at least 6 men were killed. On Jun 7, 1945, while replenishing ordnance in Leyte Gulf, the aircraft carrier Randolph (CV-15) was buzzed by an Army P-38 Mustang that subsequently crashed her forward flight deck. The explosion and following fire killed 14 men. On the USS Bataan (CVL-29), Jul 4, 1945, one arresting gear cable parted, killing one flight deck crew during flight operations.

Another typhoon passed within 15 miles of Okinawa, severely damaging ships in Buckner Bay anchorage. 12 small ships and landing craft sunk while 222 others beached. 73 men were killed. On Dec 5, 1945, Flight 19, comprised of 5 TBM Avengers on a training flight from Fort Lauderdale, FL, strayed off course, ran out of fuel and crashed into heavy seas. 14 men were killed and during the subsequent search, which involved hundreds of ships and aircraft, a PBM Mariner with a crew of 13 also crashed with no survivors.

Despite the inherent danger of jumping out of a plane high above the ground, the Marine parachute program had very few accidents. That may have been due in part to the system initially used to prepare the parachutes. From the very first training class, the Corps set the standard that each jumper would pack his own parachute. In addition, a trained rigger supervised the task and had to sign his name on the tag before the parachute was certified for use. Later this procedure was dropped and riggers packed all
parachutes for use in the FMF, but by that time Marines were making very few jumps. The record indicates only one Marine accident that may have involved a malfunctioning parachute.

During training on New Caledonia, one man’s main parachute failed to open properly. He pulled the ripcord on his reserve, but it just had time to begin deploying when he hit the ground. Observers thought, however, that the main parachute did not deploy because the suspension lines tangled up in the Marine’s rifle. Three other men died in Marine Corps jumping accidents not related to the performance of the parachute. Two men drowned after landing in water; one at Norfolk, Virginia, and one at New River, North Carolina. The final fatality occurred when a New River trainee lost his nerve just as he approached the door of the plane. He moved out of the line of jumpers, but his static line became tangled with the next man to go out. The non-jumper’s parachute opened while he was inside the plane and the billowing chute slammed him against the aircraft body hard enough to wreck the door and sever his spine.

The most unusual accident occurred near San Diego, California, on May 15, 1941. 2/Lt Walter A. Osipoff and 11 enlisted men of Able Co were making a practice jump over Kearney Mesa. Everyone else had exited the plane and he threw out a cargo pack, which possibly tangled in his static line. His parachute opened prematurely while he was still in the door of the plane; it billowed outside the aircraft and pulled him out, but the canopy and suspension lines tangled in the bundle of static lines streaming beside the transport. For a moment the cargo pack, Osipoff, and his partially opened parachute were all suspended from the cable that held the static lines. Under this combined load the bracket holding one end of the cable gave way and it streamed out the door. The cargo pack fell away, but Osipoff and his parachute remained dangling from the cable and static lines, suspended behind the plane’s tail. The accident also ruined his reserve chute and ripped away from the part of his harness attached to his chest. He ended up being dragged through the air feet-first, held only by the leg straps.
The crew of the plane attempted to pull him in but could not do so. Since the transport had no radio communications, the pilot flew it over the field at North Island to attract attention. Two Navy test pilots, Lt William W. Lowery and Aviation Chief Machinist’s Mate John R. McCants, saw the problem and took off in a SOC-1, an open-cockpit, two-seater biplane. The SOC-1 flew just below and behind the transport while McCants attempted to pull Osipoff into his cockpit. It was an incredible display of flying skill gave the necessity to avoid hitting the Marine lieutenant with the SOC-1’s propellers. McCants finally succeeded in getting him headfirst into the plane, though his legs dangled outside. Before McCants could cut the shroud lines, bumpy air pushed the biplane up and its propellers did the job (chopping off 12 inches of the tail cone of the transport in the process). Lowery landed his aircraft as McCants maintained his tenuous grip on the Marine parachutist.

Osipoff suffered severe cuts and bruises and a fractured vertebra. He spent three months in a body cast, but fully recovered and returned to jump status. Lowery and McCants received Distinguished Flying Crosses for their successful rescue.

Rendez-vous at Gavutu

After four months of war, the 1st Marine Division was alerted to its first prospect of action. The vital Samoan Islands appeared to be next on the Japanese invasion list and the Navy called upon the Marines to provide the necessary reinforcements for the meager garrison.

In March 1942, Headquarters created two brigades for the mission, cutting a regiment and a slice of supporting forces from each of the two Marine divisions. The 7th Marines got the nod at New River and became the nucleus of the 3d Brigade.

That force initially included Edson’s 1st Raider Battalion but no paratroopers. In the long run that was a plus for the 1st Parachute Battalion, which remained relatively untouched as the brigade siphoned off much of the best manpower and equipment of the division to bring itself to full readiness. The division already was reeling from the difficult process of wartime expansion. In the past few months, it had absorbed thousands of newly minted Marines, subdivided units to create new ones, given up some of its best assets to field the raiders and the parachutists, and built up a base and training areas from the pine forests of New River, North Carolina.

The parachutists and the remainder of the division did not have long to wait for their own call to arms, however. In early April, Headquarters alerted the 1st Marine Division that it would begin movement overseas in May. The destination was New Zealand, where everyone assumed the division would have months to complete the process of turning raw manpower into well-trained units. Part of the division shoved off from Norfolk in May. Some elements, including Baker and Charlie Cos of the parachutists, took trains to the West Coast and boarded naval transports there on Jun 19. The rest of the 1st Parachute Battalion was part of a later Norfolk echelon, which set sail for New Zealand on 10 June. While the parachutists were still at sea, the echelon of the division had already bedded down in New Zealand.

But the 1st Marine Division’s commander, Gen Vandegrift, received a rude shock shortly after he and his staff settled into their headquarters at a Wellington hotel. He and his outfit were slated to invade and seize islands in the southern Solomons group on Aug 1st, just five weeks hence. To complicate matters, there was very little solid intelligence about the objectives. There were no maps on hand, so the division had to create its own from poor aerial photos and sketches hand-drawn by former planters and traders familiar with the area.

Planners estimated that there were about 5275 enemies on Guadalcanal (home to a Japanese airfield under construction) and a total of 1850 on Tulagi and Gavutu-Tanambogo. Tulagi, 17 miles north of Guadalcanal, was valuable for its anchorage and seaplane base. The islets of Gavutu and Tanambogo, joined by a causeway, hosted a seaplane base and Japanese shore installations and menaced the approaches to Tulagi. In reality, there were probably 536 men on Gavutu-Tanambogo, most of them part of construction or aviation support units, though there was at least one platoon of the 3d Kure Special Naval Landing Force, the ground combat arm of the Imperial Navy.

The list of heavy weapons on Gavutu-Tanambogo included two three-inch guns (76.2-MM) and an assortment of AAA and AT guns and machine guns. By the time the last transports docked in New Zealand on July 11, planners had outlined the operation and the execution date had slipped to August 7 to allow the division a chance to gather its far-flung echelons and combat load transports.

Five battalions of the 1st and 5th Marines would land on the large island of Guadalcanal at 0800 on Aug 7 and seize the unfinished airfield on the north coast. The 1st Raider Battalion, slated to meet the division on the way to the objective, would simultaneously assault Tulagi. The 2/5th Marines, would follow in trace and support the raiders. The 2d Marines, also scheduled to rendezvous with the division at sea, would serve as the reserve force and land 20 minutes prior to H-Hour on Florida Island, thought to be undefended.

The paratroopers received the mission of attacking Gavutu at H plus four hours. The delay resulted from the need for planes, ships, and landing craft to concentrate first in support of the Tulagi operation. Once the paratroopers secured Gavutu, they would move on to their sister unit.

(right) Organization: Pestilence (TF-1), Watchover (Tulagi & Guadalcanal) and Cactus (Guadalcanal) VAdm Ghormley, exercising strategic command, set up his organization in three main groups. The Carrier Force (TF-61) commanded by RAdm Leigh Noyes, was composed of elements of three task forces from Nimitz’ area-11, 16, and 18. It would include three carriers – the Saratoga, the Enterprise, and the Wasp – the fast new battleship North Carolina, five heavy cruisers, one so-called antiaircraft cruiser, and 16 destroyers. The Amphibious Force (TF-62) commanded by RAdm Richmond K. Turner, USN, included the FMF Landing Force, 48 six heavy cruisers, two light cruisers, 15 destroyers, 13 attack transports, six attack cargo ships, four destroyer transport, and five minesweepers. Shore-Based Aircraft (TF-63) under command of RAdm J.S. McCain, USN, (Commander Aircraft South Pacific) included all aircraft in the area approximately 250 carrier aircraft available only under certain conditions, 166 Navy and Marine Corps planes including two USMC squadrons (VMF-212) and (VMO-251), 95 Army planes, and 30 planes from the Royal New Zealand Air Force, a total of 291 aircraft.

The Tulagi, Gavutu-Tanambogo, and Florida operations fell under the immediate control of a task force designated as the Northern Group, headed by Gen William H. Rupertus, the assistant division commander. After a feverish week of unloading, sorting, and reloading equipment and supplies, the parachutists boarded the transport, USS Heywood, on Jul 18 and sailed in convoy to Koro Island in the Fijis, where the entire invasion force conducted landing rehearsals on Jul 28 and 30. These went poorly since the Navy boat crews and most of the 1st Marine Division were too green. The parachute battalion was better trained than most of the division, but this was its very first experience as a unit in conducting a seaborne landing. There is no indication that planners gave any thought to using their airborne capability, though in all likelihood that was due to the lack of transport aircraft or the inability of available planes to make a round-trip flight from New Zealand to the Solomons.
The paratroopers had the toughest mission in many respects. With a grand total of eight small infantry platoons, they had just 361 Marines, much less than half the manpower of other line battalions. More importantly, they lacked the punch of heavy mortars and machine guns and had fewer of the light versions of these weapons, too. Even their high proportion of individual automatic weapons would not help much; many of these were the unreliable Reising submachine gun. The late hour of their attack also sacrificed any element of surprise, though planners assumed that naval and aerial firepower would suppress Japanese defenders. Nor was terrain in their favor. The coral reef surrounding the islets meant that the only suitable landing site was the boat basin on the northeast coast of Gavutu, but that point was subject to flanking fire from defenders on Tanambogo. In addition, a steep ship soon opened up on the initial objectives while Marines clambered down cargo nets into landing craft.

The parachutists watched while their fellow sea-soldiers conducted the first American amphibious assault of the war. As the morning progressed and opposition on Tulagi appeared light, the antiaircraft cruiser San Juan conducted three fire missions against Gavutu and Tanambogo, expending 1200 rounds in all. Just prior to noon, the supporting naval forces turned their full fury on the parachute battalion’s initial objective. San Juan poured 280 five-inch shells onto Gavutu in four minutes, then a flight of dive bombers from the carrier Wasp struck the northern side of the island, which had been masked from the fire of ship’s guns. Oily black smoke coral hill dominated the flat coastal area of each islet. Finally, despite a rule of thumb that the attackers should outnumber defenders by three to one in an amphibious assault, they were going up against a significantly larger enemy force. The parachutists’ only advantage was their high level of training and esprit. The US task force sailed into the waters between Guadalcanal and Florida Island in the pre-dawn darkness of Aug 7, 1942.
Planes rose into the sky and most Marines assumed that few could survive such a pounding, but the display of firepower probably produced few casualties among the defenders, who had long since sought shelter in numerous caves and dugouts. The bombardment did destroy one three-inch gun on Gavutu, as well as the seaplane ramp the parachutists had hoped to land on, thus forcing the Higgins boats to divert to a nearby pier or a small beach.
The intense preparation fires had momentarily stunned the defenders, however, and the first wave of Marines from Able Co clambered from their landing craft onto the dock against little opposition. The Japanese quickly recovered and soon opened up with heavier fire that stopped Able Co’s advance toward Hill 148 after the Marines had progressed just 75 yards. Enemy gunners also devoted some of their attention to the two succeeding waves and inflicted casualties as they made the long approach around Gavutu to reach the northern shore.

Baker Co landed four minutes after H-Hour against stiff opposition, as did Charlie Co seven minutes later. The latter unit’s commander Capt Richard J. Huerth, took a bullet in the head just as he rose from his boat and he fell back into it dead. Capt Emerson E. Mason, the battalion intelligence officer, also received a fatal wound as he reached the beach.

When Charlie Co’s two platoons came ashore, they took up positions facing Tanambogo to return enfilading fire from that direction, while Baker Co began a movement to the left around the hill. That masked them from Tanambogo and allowed them to make some progress. The nature of the enemy action-defenders shooting from concealed underground positions surprised the parachutists. Several Marines became casualties when they investigated quiet cave openings, only to be met by bursts of fire. The battalion communications officer died in this manner. Many other parachutists withheld their fire because they saw no targets. Marines tossed grenades into caves and dugouts, but oftentimes soon found themselves being fired on from these ‘silenced’ positions. (Later investigation revealed that baffles built inside the entrances protected the occupants or that connecting trenches and tunnels allowed new defenders to occupy the defensive works).

Twenty minutes into the battle, Maj Williams began leading men up Hill 148 and took a bullet in his side that put him out of action. The enemy fire drove off attempts to pull him to safety and his executive officer, Maj Charles A. Miller, took control of the operation. Miller established the command post and aid station in a partially demolished building near the dock area. Around 1400, Miller called for an airstrike against Tanambogo and about half an hour later he radioed for reinforcements.

While the paratroopers awaited this assistance, Baker Co and a few men from Able Co continued to attack Hill 148 from its eastern flank. Individuals and small groups worked from dugout to dugout under rifle and machine-gun fire from the enemy. Learning from initial experience, Marines began to tie demolition charges of TNT to longboards and stuff them into the entrances. That prevented the enemy from throwing back the explosives and it permanently put the positions out of action. Capt Harry L. Torgerson and Cpl Johnnie Blackan distinguished themselves in this effort. Other men, such as Sgt Max Koplow and Cpl Ralph W. Fordyce, took a more direct approach and entered the bunkers with submachine guns blazing. Plat Sgt Harry M. Tully used his marksmanship skill and Johnson rifle to pick off a number of Japanese snipers.

The paratroopers got their 60-MM mortars into action, too, and used them against Japanese positions on the upper slopes of Hill 148. By 1430, the eastern half of the island was secure, but enemy fire from Tanambogo kept the parachutists from overrunning the western side of the hill. In the course of the afternoon, the Navy responded to Miller’s call for support. Dive bombers worked over Tanambogo, then two destroyers closed on the island and thoroughly shelled it. In the midst of this action, one pilot mistakenly dropped his ordnance on Gavutu’s hilltop and inflicted several casualties on Baker Co. By 1800, the battalion succeeded in raising the US flag at the summit of Hill 148 and physically occupying the remainder of Gavutu. With the suppression of fire from Tanambogo and the cover of night, the parachutists collected their casualties, to include Maj Williams, and began evacuating the wounded to the transports. Ground reinforcements arrived more slowly than fire support. Baker 1/2-USMC Regt, reported to Miller on Gavutu at 1800. He ordered them to make an amphibious landing on Tanambogo and arranged for preparatory fire by a destroyer.

The paratroopers also would support the move with their fire and Charlie Co would attack across the causeway after the landing. Miller, perhaps buoyed by the late afternoon decrease in enemy fire from Tanambogo, was certain that the fresh force would carry the day. For his part, Baker Co’s commander left the meeting under the impression that there were only a few snipers left on the island.

The attack ran into trouble from the beginning and the Marine force ended up withdrawing under heavy fire. During the night, the paratroopers dealt with Japanese emerging from dugouts or swimming ashore from Tanambogo or Florida. Heavy rain helped conceal these attempts at infiltration, but the enemy accomplished little. At 2200, Gen Rupertus requested additional forces to seize Tanambogo and the 3/2-USMC Regt, went ashore on Gavutu late in the morning on August 8. They took over many of the positions facing Tanambogo and in the afternoon launched an amphibious attack of one company supported by three tanks. Another platoon followed up the landing by attacking across the causeway.

Bitter fighting ensued and the 3d Battalion did not completely secure Tanambogo until August 9. This outfit suffered additional casualties on August 8 when yet another Navy dive bomber mistook Gavutu for Tanambogo and struck Hill 148.

In the first combat operation of an American parachute unit, the battalion had suffered severe losses: 28 killed and about 50 wounded, nearly all of the latter requiring evacuation. The dead included four officers and 11 NCOs. The casualty rate of just over 20 percent was by far the highest of any unit in the fighting to secure the initial lodgment in the Guadalcanal area. The raiders were next in line with roughly 10 percent.

The Japanese force defending Gavutu-Tanambog was nearly wiped out, with only a handful surrendering or escaping to Florida Island. Despite the heavy odds the paratroopers had faced, they had proved more than equal to the faith placed in their capabilities and had distinguished themselves in a very tough fight. In addition to raw courage, they had displayed the initiative and resourcefulness required to deal with a determined and cunning enemy.

On the night of August 8, a Japanese surface force arrived from Rabaul and surprised the Allied naval forces guarding the transports. In a brief engagement, the enemy sank four cruisers and a destroyer, damaged other ships, and killed 1200 sailors, all at minimal cost to themselves. The American naval commander had little choice the next morning but to order the early withdrawal of his force. Most of the transports would depart that afternoon with their cargo holds half full, leaving the Marines short of food, ammunition, and equipment.

The paratroopers suffered an additional loss that would make life even more miserable for them. They had landed on August 7 with just their weapons, ammunition, and a two-day supply of C and D rations. They had placed their extra clothing, mess gear, and other essential field items into individual rolls and loaded them on a landing craft for movement to the beach after they secured the islands. As the paratroopers fought onshore, Navy personnel decided they needed to clear out the boat, so they uncomprehendingly tossed all the gear into the sea. The battalion ended its brief association with Gavutu on the afternoon of August 9 and shifted to a bivouac site on Tulagi.

Raid in Tasimboko

As August progressed it became clear that the Japanese were focusing their effort in the Solomons on regaining the vital airfield on Guadalcanal. The enemy poured fresh troops onto the island via the Tokyo Express a shuttle of ships and barges coming down the Slot each night. The 1st Marines destroyed the newly landed Ichiki Detachment along the Tenaru River on August 21, but the understrength Marine division had too few troops to secure the entire perimeter. To bolster his force, Gen Vandegrift brought the raiders over from Tulagi at the end of August and switched the paratroopers a few days later. The two battalions went into reserve in a coconut grove near Lunga Point.

During this period Maj Miller took ill and went into the field hospital, as did other paratroopers. The shrinking battalion, temporarily commanded by a captain and down to less than 300 operational men, was so depleted in numbers and senior leadership that Vandegrift decided to attach them to Edson’s 1st Raider Battalion. The combined unit roughly equaled the size of a standard infantry battalion, though it still lacked the heavy firepower.

Following the arrival of the first aviation reinforcements on August 20, the division made use of its daytime control of the skies to launch a number of seaborne operations. Near the end of the month, a battalion of the 5th Marines conducted an amphibious spoiling attack on Japanese forces to the west of the perimeter but inflicted little damage due to a lack of aggressive leadership. Two companies of raiders found no enemy after scouring Savo Island on September 4, while a mixup in communications scrubbed a similar foray scheduled the next day for Cape Esperance.

By Sep 6, Japanese naval activity and native scouting reports indicated that the enemy was concentrating fresh troops near the village of Tasimboko, located on the coast several miles east of the Marine lines. Edson and Col Gerald C. Thomas, the division operations officer, hatched a plan to raid this eastern terminus of the Tokyo Express on Sep 8.

Intelligence initially placed two or three hundred Japanese at Tasimboko, with their defenses located west of the village and facing toward Henderson Field. Edson planned to land to the east of the village and attack them from the rear. The available shipping consisted of two transport destroyers (APDs) and two small, converted tuna boats, so the raider commander divided his force into two waves. The raider rifle companies would embark on the evening of Sep 7 and land just prior to dawn, then the tiny fleet would shuttle back to the perimeter to pick up the weapons company and the paratroopers.

Since the APDs were needed for other missions, the Marine force would have to complete its work and reembark the same day, the Navy had already lost 3 of the original 6 APDs in Guadalcanal. On the evening of Sep 7, native scouts brought news that the enemy force at Tasimboko had swelled to several thousand. Division planners discounted these reports, believing that they were greatly exaggerated or referred to remnants of previously defeated formations. When the raiders landed at 0520 a day later, they immediately realized that the natives had provided accurate information. Not far from the beach, Marines discovered endless rows of neatly placed life preservers, a large number of foxholes, and several unattended 37-MM antitank guns. Luckily for Edson’s outfit, Gen Kiyotake Kawaguchi and his brigade of more than 3000 men already had departed into the interior. Only a rearguard of 300 soldiers remained behind to secure the Japanese base at Tasimboko, but even that small force was nearly as large as the first wave of raiders.

Dog Co of the raiders (little more than a platoon in strength) remained at the landing beach as rear security while the other companies moved west toward Tasimboko. The raiders soon ran into stubborn resistance, with the Japanese firing artillery over open sights directly at the advancing Marines. Edson sent one company-wide to the left to flank the defenders. As the action developed, the APDs Manley and McKean returned to Kukum Beach at 0755 and the Parachute Battalion (less Charlie Co) debarked within 25 minutes. The 208 paratroopers joined Dog Co ashore by 1130 and went into defensive positions adjacent to them. Edson, fearing that he might be moving into a Japanese trap, already had radioed division twice and asked for reinforcements, to include another landing to the west of Tasimboko in what was now the enemy rear.

In reply, the division ordered the raiders and the paratroopers to withdraw. Edson persisted, however, and Japanese resistance melted away about noon. The raider assault echelon entered the village and discovered a stockpile of food, ammunition, and weapons ranging up to 75-MM artillery pieces. The raider and parachute rear guard closed up on the main force and the Marines set about destroying the enemy supply base. Three hours later the combined unit began to reembark and all were back in the division perimeter by nightfall.
The raid was a minor tactical victory with a major operational impact on the Guadalcanal campaign. At a cost of two killed and six wounded, the Marines had killed 27 Japanese. The enemy suffered more grievously in terms of lost firepower, logistics, and communication. Intelligence gathered at the scene also revealed some details about the coming Japanese offensive. These latter facts would allow the 1st Marine Division to fight off one of the most serious challenges to its tenuous hold on Henderson Field.

The Bloody Battle of and around Edson’s Ridge

On Sep 9, Edson met with division planners to discuss the results of the raid. Intelligence officers translating captured documents indicated that up to 3000 Japanese were cutting their way through the jungle southwest of Tasimboko. Edson was convinced that they planned to attack the unguarded southern portion of the perimeter. From an aerial photograph, he picked out a grass-covered ridge that pointed like a knife at the airfield. He based his hunch on his experience with the Japanese and in jungle operations in Nicaragua. Col Thomas agreed. Vandegrift, just in the process of moving his command post into that area, was reluctant to accept a conclusion that would force him to move yet again. After much discussion, he allowed Thomas to shift the bivouac of the raiders and parachutists to the ridge to get them out of the pattern of bombs falling around the airfield. The combined force moved to the new location on Sep 10 and quickly discovered that it was not the rest area they had hoped to enjoy.

Orders came down from Edson to dig in and enemy aircraft bombed the ridge on the 11th and 12th, inflicting several casualties. Native scouts reported the progress of the Japanese column and Marine patrols confirmed the presence of strong enemy forces to the southeast of the perimeter.

The raiders and the paratroopers found the process of constructing defensive positions tough going. There were very little barbed wire and no sandbags or heavy tools. Men digging in on the ridge itself found coral just below the shallow surface soil. The units disposed in the flanking jungle were hampered by the thick growth, which reduced fields of fire to nothing. Both units were smaller than ever, as tropical illnesses, poor diet, and lack of sleep combined to swell the number of men in the field hospital. Those still listed as effective often were just barely so.
Edson faced a tough situation as he contemplated how to defend the ridge area. Several hundred yards to the right of his coral hogback was the Lunga River; beyond it, elements of the 1st Pioneer and 1st Amphibious Tractor Battalions had strong points. More than a mile to his left was the tail end of the 1st Marine Regiment’s positions along the Tenaru River. With the exception of the kunai grass-covered slopes of the ridge, everything else was a dense jungle. His small force, about the size of a single infantry battalion but lacking all the heavy weapons, could not possibly establish a classic linear defense. Edson placed the paratroopers on the east side of the ridge with Baker Co holding a line running from the slope of Hill 80 into the jungle. The other two companies echeloned to the rear to hold the left flank.

Baker Co occupied the right slope of Hill 80 and anchored their right on a lagoon; Charlie Co placed platoon strong points between the lagoon and the river, and the remaining raiders were in reserve near Hill 120. Thomas moved the 2/5-USMC Regt, into position between the ridge and the airfield and reoriented some of his artillery to fire to the south. Artillery forward observers joined Edson’s command post on the front slope of Hill 120 and registered the guns.
On the Jap’s side, Kawaguchi’s Brigade faced its own troubles as it fought through the jungle and over the numerous slimy ridges. The rough terrain had forced the Japanese to leave behind their artillery and most of their supplies. Their commander also detailed one of his four battalions to make a diversionary attack along the Tenaru, which left him with just 2500 men for the main assault. To make matters worse, the Japanese had underestimated the jungle and fallen behind schedule. As the sunset on Sep 12, Kawaguchi realized that only one battalion was in its assembly area and none of his units had been able to reconnoiter their routes of attack. The Japanese general tried to delay the jump off scheduled for 2200, but he could not contact his battalions.

Without guides and running late, the attack blundered forward in darkness and soon degenerated into confusion. At the appointed hour, a Japanese floatplane dropped green flares over the Marine positions. A cruiser and three destroyers began shelling the ridge area and kept up the bombardment for 20 minutes, though few rounds landed on their intended target; many sailed over the ridge into the jungle beyond. Japanese infantry followed up with their own flares and began to launch their assault. The enemy’s confusion may have benefited the parachute battalion since all the action occurred on the raider side of the position. The enemy never struck the ridge proper but did dislodge Charlie Co’s raiders, who fell back and eventually regrouped near Hill 120. At daylight, the Japanese broke off the attack and tried to reorganize for another attempt the next night. In the morning, Edson ordered a counterattack by the raiders of Dog Co and the paratroopers of Able Co to recapture Charlie Co’s position.

The far more numerous Japanese stopped them cold with machine gunfire. Since he could not eject the Japanese from a portion of his old front, the raider commander decided to withdraw the entire line to the reserve position. In the late afternoon, Baker Cos of both, raiders and paratroopers, pulled back and anchored themselves on the ridge between Hills 80 and 120. The division provided an engineer company, which Edson inserted on the right of the ridge. Able Co of the raiders covered the remaining ground to the Lunga. Charlie Co paratroopers occupied a draw just to the left rear of their own Baker Co, while Able Co held another draw on the east side of Hill 120. The raiders of Charlie and Dog Cos assumed a new reserve position on the west slope of the ridge, just behind Hill 120. Edson’s forward command post was just in front of the top of Hill 120.

Kawaguchi renewed his attack right after darkness fell on Sep 13. His first blow struck the right flank of the raiders’ Baker Co and drove more than a platoon of those Marines out of their positions. Most linked up with Charlie Co in their rear, while the remainder of Baker Co clung to its position in the center of the ridge. The Japanese did not exploit the gap, except to send some infiltrators into the rear of the raider and parachute line. They apparently cut some of the phone lines running from Edson’s command post to his companies, though he was able to warn the parachutists of the threat in their rear.
By 2100 the Japanese obviously were massing around the southern nose of the ridge, lapping around the flanks of the two Baker Cos and making their presence known with firecrackers, flares, a hellish bedlam of howls, and rhythmic chanting designed to strike fear into the heart of their enemy and draw return fire for the purpose of pinpointing automatic weapons. Edson responded with a fierce artillery barrage and orders to Charlie Co raiders and Able Co paratroopers to form a reserve line around the front and sides of Hill 120. As Japanese mortar and machine-gun, fire swept the ridge, Capt William J. McKennan and 1/Sgt Marion LeNoir gathered their paratroopers and led them into position around the knoll.


The Japanese assault waves finally surged forward around 2200. The attack, focused on the open ground of the ridge, immediately unhinged the remainder of the Marine center. Capt Justin G. Duryea, commanding the Baker Co paratroopers, ordered his men to withdraw as Marine artillery shells fell ever closer to the front lines and Japanese infantry swarmed around his left flank. He also believed that the remainder of the Baker Co raiders already was falling back on his right. To add to the confusion, Marines thought they heard shouts of gas attack as smoke rose up from the lower reaches of the ridge. Duryea’s small force ended up next to Charlie Co in the draw on the east slope, where he reported to Torgerson, now the battalion executive officer. The units were clustered in low lying ground and had no contact on their flanks. Torgerson ordered both companies to withdraw to the rear of Hill 120, where he hoped to reorganize them in the lee of the reserve line and the masking terrain. Given the collapse of the front line, it was a reasonable course of action. The withdrawal of the parachutists left the rump of the raiders, perhaps 60 men, alone in the center of the front line.

Edson arranged for covering fire from the artillery and the troops around Hill 120, then ordered Baker Co back to the knoll. There they joined the reserve line, which was now the new front line. This series of rearward movements threatened to degenerate into a rout. Night movements under fire are always confusing and commanders no longer had positive control of coherent units. There was no neat line of fighting holes to occupy, no time to hold muster and sort out raiders from paratroopers and get squads, platoons, and companies back together again. A few men began to filter to the rear of the hill, while others lay prone waiting for direction. Edson, with his command post now in the middle of the front line, took immediate action. The raider commander ordered Torgerson to lead his Companies, Baker and Charlie, from the rear of the hill and lengthen the line running from the left of Able Co’s position. Edson then made it known that this would be the final stand, that no one was authorized to retreat another step. Maj Kenneth D. Bailey, commander of the raiders from Charlie Co, played a major role in revitalizing the defenders. He moved along the line of mingled raiders and paratroopers, encouraging everyone and breathing new life into those on the verge of giving up.

Under the direction of Torgerson and unit leaders, the two parachute companies in reserve moved forward in a skirmish line and established contact on the flank of their fellows from Able Co. They met only ‘slight resistance’ in the process but soon came under heavy attack as the Japanese renewed their assault on the hill. Edson later thought that this action ‘succeeded in breaking up a threatening hostile envelopment of our position’ and ‘was a decisive factor in our ultimate victory’. The new line of raiders and paratroopers was not very strong, just a small horseshoe bent around the bare slopes of the knoll, with troops from the two battalions still intermingled in many spots. The artillery kept up a steady barrage the most intensive concentration of the campaign according to the division’s final report. And all along the line, Marines threw hand grenade after hand grenade to support the fire of their automatic weapons. Supplies of ammunition dwindled rapidly and moving cases of grenades and belted machine gun rounds to the frontline became a key element of the fight.
At 0400, Edson asked the division to commit the reserve battalion to bolster his depleted forces. One company at a time, the men of the 2/5-USMC Regt, moved along the spine of the ridge and into place beside those who had survived the long night. By dawn, the Japanese had exhausted their reservoir of fighting spirit and Kawaguchi admitted defeat in the face of a tenacious defense backed by superior firepower. The enemy began to break contact and retreat, although a number of small groups and individuals remained scattered through the jungle on the flanks and in the rear of the Marine position. The men of the 2/5-USMC Regt began the long process of rooting out these snipers, while Edson ordered up an airstrike to hasten the departure of the main Japanese force. A flight of P-40s answered the call and strafed the enemy infantry still clinging to the exposed forward slopes of Hill 80.

The raiders and the paratroopers walked off the ridge that morning and returned to their previous bivouac in the coconut grove. Although an accurate count of Japanese bodies was impossible, the division estimated there were some 700 dead sprawled around the small battlefield. Of Kawaguchi’s 500 wounded, few would survive the difficult trek back to the coast. The two-day battle on the ridge had cost the 1st Raiders 135 men and the 1st Parachute Battalion 128. Of those totals, 59 were dead or missing, including 15 parachutists killed in action. Many of the wounded parachutists would eventually return to duty, but for the moment the battalion was down to about 100 effective, the equivalent of a severely understrength rifle company. It was no longer a useful tactical entity and had seen its last action on Guadalcanal. Three days later, a convoy brought the 7th Marines to the island and the remaining men of the 1st Parachute Battalion embarked in those ships for a voyage to a welcome period of rest and recuperation in a rear area. The parachute battalion had contributed a great deal to the successful prosecution of the campaign. They had made the first American amphibious assault of the war against a defended beach and fought through the intense fire to secure the island. Despite their meager numbers, lack of senior leadership, and minimal firepower, they had stood with the raiders against difficult odds on the ridge.
The 1st Marine Division’s final report on Guadalcanal lauded that performance: the actions and conduct of those who participated in the defense of the ridge are deserving of the warmest commendation. The troops engaged were tired, sleepless and battle-weary at the outset. Throughout the night they held their positions in the face of powerful attacks by overwhelming numbers of the enemy. Driven from one position they reorganized and clung tenaciously to another until daylight found the enemy again in full flight.

Looking back on the campaign after the war, Gen Vandegrift would say: I think the most crucial moment was the Battle of the Ridge.

Recuperation and Reevaluation

The 1st Parachute Battalion arrived in New Caledonia and went into a ‘dreadful’ transient camp. For the next few weeks, the area headquarters assigned the tired, sick men of the orphaned unit to unload ships and work on construction projects. Luckily, Col Williams returned to duty after recovering from his wound and took immediate steps to rectify the situation. The battalion’s last labor project was building its own permanent quarters, named Camp Kiser after Lt Walter W. Kiser, killed at Gavutu. The site was picturesque; a grassy, undulating plain rising into low hills and overlooking the Tontouta River. Wooden structures housed the parachute loft and mess halls, but for the most part, the officers and men lived and worked in tents.

The 24 transport planes of VMJ-152 and VMJ-253 occupied a nearby airfield. The parachutists made a few conditioning hikes while they built their camp and began serious training in November. The first order of business was reintroducing themselves to their primary specialty since none of them had touched a parachute in many months. They practiced packing and jumping and graduated to tactical training emphasizing patrolling and jungle warfare. The 1st Battalion received company on Jan 11, 1943, when the 2d Battalion arrived at Tontouta and went into bivouac at Camp Kiser. The West Coast parachute outfit had continued to build itself up while his East Coast counterpart sailed with the 1st Marine Division and fought at Guadalcanal. During the summer of 1942, the 2d Battalion had found enough aircraft in busy southern California to make mass jumps with up to 14 planes. (Though ‘mass’ is a relative term here; an entire battalion required about 50 R3D-2s to jump at once).

The battalion also benefited from its additional time in the States, as it received Johnson rifles and light machine guns in place of the reviled Reisings. However, the manpower pipeline was still slow, as Charlie Co did not come into being until Sep 3, 1942 (18 months after the first paratroopers reported to San Diego for duty). The battalion sailed from San Diego in October 1942, arrived at Wellington, New Zealand in November, and departed for New Caledonia on Jan 6, 1943.

As the 2d Battalion prepared to head overseas, it detached a cadre to form the 3d Parachute Battalion, which officially came into existence on Sep 16, 1942. Compared to its older counterparts, the 3d Battalion grew like a weed and reached full strength by the end of December. The battalion commander, Maj Robert T. Vance, emphasized infantry tactics, demolition work, guerrilla warfare, and physical conditioning in addition to parachuting. At the beginning of 1943, the battalion simulated a parachute assault behind enemy lines in support of a practice amphibious landing by the 21st Marines on San Clemente Island. The fully trained outfit sailed from San Diego in March and joined the 1st and 2d Battalions at Camp Kiser before the end of the month.

At the end of 1942, the Marine Corps had transferred the parachute battalions from their respective divisions and made them a Marine Amphibious Corps asset. This recognized their special training and unique mission and theoretically allowed them to withdraw from the battlefield and rebuild while the divisions remained engaged in extended land combat. After the 3d Battalion arrived in New Caledonia in March 1943, the 1-MAC took the next logical step and created the 1st Parachute Regiment on Apr 1. This fulfilled Holland Smith’s original call for a regimental-size unit and provided for unified control of the battalions in combat and in training. Col Williams became the first commanding officer of the new organization.

Just when things appeared most promising for Marine parachuting, the Corps shifted into reverse gear. Gen Holcomb and planners at Headquarters had not shown much enthusiasm for the program since mid-1940 and apparently began to have strong second thoughts in the fall of 1942. In October, Gen Keller E. Rockey, the director of Plans and Policies at HQMC, had queried the 1-MAC about the ‘use of parachutists’ in its geographic area. There is no record of a reply, but 1-MAC later sent Col Williams in a B-24 bomber to make an aerial reconnaissance of New Georgia in the Central Solomons for a potential airborne operation.

In early 1943, 1-MAC dragged its feet on planning for the Central Solomons mission and the Navy eventually turned to the Army’s XIV Corps headquarters to command the June invasion of New Georgia. In March, the Navy decided that Vandegrift would take over 1-MAC in July, with Thomas as his chief of staff. They had suffered the loss of some of their best men to the parachute and raider programs during the difficult buildup of the 1st Marine Division and both believed that ‘the Marine Corps wasn’t an outfit that needed these specialties’. They made their thoughts on the subject known to Headquarters. The chronic shortage of aircraft also continued to hobble the program. In the summer of 1943, the Corps had just seven transport squadrons, with only one more on the drawing boards. If the entire force had been concentrated in one place, it could only have carried about one and a half battalions. As it was, three squadrons were brand new and still in the States and another one operated out of Hawaii.

There were only three in the South Pacific theater. These were fully engaged in logistics operations and were the sole asset available to make critical supply runs on short notice. As an example, the entire transport force in New Caledonia spent the middle of Oct 1942 ferrying aviation gas to Guadalcanal, 10 drums per plane, in the aftermath of the bombardment of Henderson field by Japanese battleships. They also evacuated 2879 casualties during the course of that campaign. Senior commands would have been unwilling to divert the planes from such missions for the time required to train the crews and parachutists for a mass jump in an operation.
The Army’s transport fleet was equally busy and MacArthur would not assemble enough assets to launch his first parachute assault of the Pacific war until Sep 1943 (a regimental drop in New Guinea supported by 96 C-47s). The regiment was unable to do any jumping after May 1943 due to the lack of aircraft. The 2d Battalion’s last jump was a night drop from 15 Army Air Corps C-47s.
The planes came over Tontouta off course. Unaware of the problem, the Marines jumped out onto a hilly, wooded area. One paratrooper died and 11 were injured. Thereafter, the paratroopers focused on amphibious operations and ground combat. Col Victor H. Krulak drew rubber boats for his 2d Battalion and worked on raider tactics.

In late August, 1-MAC contemplated putting them to work seizing a Japanese seaplane base at Rekat a Bay on Santa Isabel, but the enemy evacuated the installation before the intended D-Day. Near the end of Apr 1943, Rockey suggested to the Commandant that the Corps disband the parachute school at New River and use its personnel to form the fourth and final battalion. He estimated that production of 30 new jumpers per week at San Diego would be sufficient to maintain field units at full strength. The reduction in school overhead and the training pipeline would relieve some of the pressure on Marine manpower, while the barracks and classroom space at New River would meet the needs of the burgeoning Women’s Reserve program. Gen Harry Schmidt, acting in place of Holcomb, signed off on the recommendations. Baker Co of the 4th Battalion had formed in southern California on Apr 2, 1943. Nearly all of the 33 officers and 727 enlisted men of the New River school transferred to Camp Pendleton in early July to flesh out the remainder of the battalion. Transport planes were hard to come by in the States, too, and the outfit never conducted a tactical training jump during its brief existence.

Operation Blissful Choiseul

The Allied campaign in the Central Solomons had as its ultimate objective the encirclement and neutralization of the major Japanese air and naval base of Rabaul. As the South Pacific command contemplated its next step toward that goal, it initially focused on the Shortland Islands, but these were too heavily defended in comparison with the available Allied forces. Planners then turned their attention to Choiseul Island. Once seized, airbases there would allow US airpower to neutralize enemy airfields on the northern and southern tips of Bougainville. Gen Douglas MacArthur, the Southwest Pacific commander, wanted to short-circuit the process and move directly to Bougainville, which would allow American fighter planes to effectively support bomber attacks on Rabaul.
Adm William F. Halsey’s South Pacific command had too few transports and Marines to make a direct assault on the strongly garrisoned airfields on the northern and southern tips of Bougainville, so he decided to seize the Empress Augusta Bay region midway up the western side of the island and build his own airbases. Defenses there were negligible and Bougainville’s difficult terrain would prevent any rapid reaction from enemy ground forces located elsewhere on the island.
D-Day for the Empress Augusta Bay operation was Nov 1, 1943. Two regiments of the 3rd Marine Division and two marine raider battalions (organized regiment as the 2nd Raider Regiment), and the 3rd Defense Battalion formed the assault echelon for the landing. The division’s third regiment, the Army’ s 37th Infantry Division, and assorted other units would arrive later to reinforce the perimeter while construction troops built the new airfields. The 1-MAC staff slated the 1st Parachute Regiment as the reserve force. The 2d Parachute Battalion sailed to Guadalcanal in early September and then moved forward to a staging area at Vella Lavella on Oct 1. New Zealand and US forces already had secured part of that island, but the Japanese still were contesting control of the air overhead and small bands of soldiers were roaming the jungle. Enemy planes struck the parachute battalion’s small convoy of three APDs and an LST as it unloaded and put two bombs into the tank landing ship just as it was preparing to touch the beach.
It sank in shallow water, which allowed most of the troops to make it ashore. But 14 paratroopers and the battalion lost most of its supplies and unit equipment.

Once established in camp, the parachutists conducted patrols to search for Japanese stragglers on the island. The rest of the regiment arrived in Vella Lavella during the latter part of October. As the final planning for Bougainville progressed, the 1-MAC staff grew concerned that preliminary operations might make it obvious to the Japanese that an invasion was in the offing. To address that problem, in mid-October Maj James C. Murray, staff secretary, advanced the idea that a raid on Choiseul, might make the enemy think that it was the next objective. Even if that did not dissuade them about Bougainville, it might cause them to suspect that a US landing on Bougainville would come on the east coast, since Choiseul would be a move in that direction. On Oct 20, Vandegrift brought Col Krulak, the 2d Battalion commander, to Guadalcanal for a conference with the 1-MAC staffers, who outlined the scheme. The corps issued final orders on Oct 22, for the 2d Parachute Battalion to begin the raid six days later. Intelligence indicated there were up to 4000 Japanese on the island, most of them dispersed in small camps along the coast awaiting transportation for a withdrawal to Bougainville. Their supply situation supposedly was poor, although planners believed they still had most of their weapons, to include mortars and light artillery.

The 2d Parachute Battalion’s mission was to land at an undefended area near Voza, conduct raids along the northwestern coast, select a site for a possible PT [patrol torpedo] boat base, and withdraw after 12 days if the Navy decided it did not want to establish a PT boat facility. The paratroopers were to give the enemy the impression that they were a large force trying to seize Choiseul. To beef up the battalion’s firepower, 1-MAC attached a platoon of machine guns from the regimental weapons company and an experimental rocket platoon. (The latter unit – a lieutenant and eight men – had 40 of these fin-stabilized, 65-pound weapons (2.36 Rocket Launcher M-1). They were not very accurate, but their 1000-meter range and large warhead gave the lightly armed battalion a hefty punch).
A detachment of four landing craft would remain with the force and give it some mobility. A Navy PBY also landed at Choiseul and brought out an Australian detachment of coast watchers, Carden W. Seton, who would accompany the raid force and ensure it received the full support of local natives. Altogether the reinforced battalion numbered about 700 men.
Krulak planned a night landing at 0100 on Oct 28. His order emphasized the nature of the operation: The ‘basic principle is a strike and move; avoid decisive engagement with superior forces’. Early in the evening of Oct 27, four APDs and the destroyer Conway (DD-507) hove to off Vella Lavella. The 2d Battalion, which had half its supplies already preloaded in landing craft, completed debarkation in less than an hour. The small convoy had a short but eventful trip to Choiseul, as an unidentified aircraft dropped bombs close aboard one of the APDs. The ships arrived early off Voza and the small Marine force was completely ashore by 0100.

In the course of the landing, a Japanese floatplane unsuccessfully attacked the Conway, again missing the target by a narrow margin. Shortly after the ships departed, another Japanese plane appeared, circled the landing beach and dropped two bombs that landed just offshore. One platoon accompanied the boats to Zinoa Island and camouflaged them, while the rest of the battalion made an early morning move less than a mile inland to a mountain hideout that would serve as its patrol base. Local natives had already blazed a trail through the jungle and now provided bearers to assist in moving supplies. The parachutists created a dummy supply dump of empty boxes on a beach two miles to the north to invite enemy attention to the landing. To back up the diversion, on Oct 30 Halsey’s command released to the press news of the invasion by paratroopers. At least one newspaper illustrated the story with fanciful drawings of parachutists floating down from the sky. In the afternoon a small Marine patrol moved west along the seacoast to investigate possible sites for a PT base. Two other native patrols working farther away from Voza provided the battalion with information on the nearest Japanese dispositions. Approximately 200 enemies were guarding a barge station at Sangigai to the southeast, while another force was 18 miles to the northwest beyond the Warrior River. Krulak decided to attack Sangigai on the 30th.
On the 29th he sent out several patrols and personally led one to reconnoiter the objective. Krulak’s reinforced squad encountered 10 Japanese unloadings a barge near Sangigai and killed seven of them. Later in the day an outpost drove off a Japanese platoon and killed seven more enemy soldiers. Some of the patrols observed considerable barge traffic moving along the coast.

On Oct 30, two companies reinforced by machine guns and rockets moved overland toward Sangigai. Easy Co continued down the beach trail while Fox Co split off and moved inland to take the base from the rear. Early in the morning, a prearranged airstrike of 12 torpedo bombers had hit identified enemy positions just outside Sangigai. When Easy Co approached the same area at 1430, it executed a bombardment with its mortars and 36 of the experimental rockets. The Japanese retreated to the interior after being hit by the barrage, with the apparent intent of occupying prepared defensive works located there.

They arrived at their destination at the same time that Fox Co was approaching the area. The Marines, still in a single-file approach formation, were almost as surprised as the enemy; they received only the briefest warning from the accompanying native scouts. The lead platoon of parachutists reacted immediately and attacked; the next platoon in line moved out to the right of the route of march to flank the Japanese.

The enemy occupied their positions and responded with rifles, machine guns, and knee mortars. After 15 minutes of heavy fighting, the parachutists were making slow progress when the Japanese suddenly launched a Banzai-style attack. Marine machine guns cut them down and stopped the charge in short order. Fox Co’s 3d platoon then moved out to the left to cut off the enemy’s retreat, but the Japanese ran headlong into the 2d Platoon instead and lost yet more men. About 40 escaped the net, but they left 72 dead on the battlefield.

While that fight raged in the jungle, Easy Co entered Sangigai unopposed. It destroyed supplies, installations, defensive positions, and one barge. Captured documents included a chart pinpointing minefields off Bougainville. The company then linked up with landing craft and made it back to base that evening. Casualties slowed the movement of Fox Co through the dense jungle and it ended up spending the night near the coast before getting boated back to Voza the next day. The cost of the victory was 6 dead, 1 missing, and 12 wounded, the last figure including Krulak, who suffered wounds in his face and arm from fragments. A flying boat evacuated the severest casualties and picked up the invaluable mine charts.

On Nov 1, Maj Warner T. Bigger, the battalion executive officer, launched an operation in the other direction with the goal of destroying barges in Choiseul Bay and bombarding enemy installations on Guppy Island. Maj Bigger and a reinforced George Co (less one rifle platoon) rode landing craft to the Warrior River, where they left their sole radio and a security team before moving overland toward their objective. Things began to go wrong thereafter. The native scouts were unfamiliar with the area and the patrol soon found itself going in a circle. Bigger and his force bivouacked for the night, but he sent one squad back to the Warrior River to make a report to the battalion by radio.
At dawn on Nov 2, the squad and radio team awoke to find a Japanese platoon in the immediate vicinity. After a firefight, the Marines broke contact and joined up with the boats, which were waiting along the coast at Nukiki.

On the way back to Voza they observed eight Japanese barges at Moli Island, which indicated there was an even larger enemy force between the two wings of the 2d Battalion. Concerned that Maj Bigger’s force might be cut off, Krulak requested air and PT support from 1-MAC and ordered the landing craft to return to the Warrior River. George Co had moved out for Choiseul Bay at 0630 and met up with a local native who guided them to the coast. They encountered an occupied bunker on the beach and killed five Japanese, then set up their 60-MM mortars and fired 142 rounds onto Guppy Island. (To obtain a clear area to fire the mortars, the Marines had to set up their weapons in the sea with only the upper half of the tubes projecting above the surface of the water).

The bombardment started several blazes, one obviously a burning fuel dump. The enemy replied with ineffective machine-gun fire from the island and farther up the coast. Maj Bigger and his main body returned to the Warrior River at 1600. They expected to meet the landing craft there but found none. When they attempted to cross the river to reach the radio team (unaware that it was gone) they came under fire from Japanese forces. After 90 minutes of fighting, three boats appeared, with Marines on board firing their weapons. The Japanese fire died down in the face of this new opposition and George Co embarked in the midst of heavy rain and high seas. One craft hit a reef after retracting from the beach and began to take on water. Then its engine died and it drifted toward the enemy-held beach. Two PT boats, one commanded by Lt John F. Kennedy, finally came on the scene and took aboard the men on that boat. Three aircraft appeared at the same time and covered the operation by strafing the shore. The combat patrol had killed 42 Japanese in several firefights and inflicted undetermined casualties and damage with its mortar fire. Marine losses were 2 killed, 1 wounded, and 2 missings (natives later recovered the bodies of these two men).
While Maj Bigger operated to the northwest, Krulak dispatched platoon-sized patrols to the southeast toward Sangigai. Two of them made contact with smaller enemy units on Nov 1. They dispatched at least 17 Japanese at the cost of one Marine killed. Intelligence gathered by Marine and native patrols indicated that the Japanese were moving from both directions to recapture Voza and secure their barge lines and the important coastal track (the only trail for movement to the northwest). There were an estimated 1800 enemy troops to the southeast and possibly 3000 in the opposite direction. Krulak assumed that the Japanese were becoming aware of the strength and limited mission of his force given the Marine withdrawals from Sangigai and Choiseul Bay. On the afternoon of Nov 2, he informed 1-MAC of developments and stated that his battalion could handle the enemy for a week, though increasing Japanese activity would hamper Marine patrol operations. In the meantime, he took steps to strengthen his defenses. He placed a platoon-size out guard on each flank of Voza, put his demolition platoon to work laying mines, and requested that PT boats patrol the coast to hinder the approach of Japanese forces by barge.

The corps staff had considered expanding the operation on Oct 30 by inserting the rest of the parachute regiment. Now they radioed Krulak and asked him for his ‘frank suggestion whether we should remove your outfit tomorrow night’. The message ended with a straightforward assessment: ‘Feel your mission accomplished’. The parachute commander responded that he expected a strong Japanese attack within 48 hours and recommended withdrawal in light of 1-MAC’s view that nothing further could be gained by continuing operations. Two days into the Empress Augusta Bay landing, it must have been obvious to the Japanese that the west coast of Bougainville was the main target and Choiseul was a diversion. In the afternoon of Nov 3, the battalion moved to the beach at Voza and established a perimeter pending the nighttime arrival of four LCIs (one of them a gunboat version to provide covering fire). The demolition platoon placed out hundreds of booby traps on avenues of approach, to include a rocket suspended in a tree and double-edged razor blades worked into palm trunks (to discourage snipers from clambering into their habitual perches). As darkness fell, native scouts reported that Japanese forces were moving closer and enemy patrols began to reach the Voza area near midnight, as evidenced by exploding booby traps. The three transport LCIs arrived just prior to that and beached by 0130. The parachutists were completely loaded in less than 20 minutes and were back at Vella Lavella by 0800.
As the battalion marched to its camp, coastwatchers were reporting the occupation of Voza by the enemy, who still was having difficulty with the varied devices left by the Marines. At a cost of 11 dead and 14 wounded, the 2d Battalion had killed a minimum of 143 Japanese and seriously disrupted the movement of enemy forces from Choiseul to points northward.

The minefield chart also provided valuable assistance to naval operations in the northern Solomons. Halsey ordered mines laid in the clear channels and they eventually sank two Japanese ships. In retrospect, 1-MAC may have staged the operation too late and with too small a force to serve as a good diversion, though it did have some effect on Japanese actions.

The enemy apparently shuttled some troops from the Shortlands to Choiseul and on Nov 1 sent a heavy bomber strike to attack the task force they assumed would be located off the Voza beachhead. In any case, the raid kept the Japanese high command guessing for a time and certainly must have given them a reason to be concerned about the prospect of future attacks of a similar nature.

Col Williams later would call the Choiseul operation ‘a brilliant little bit of work’.

Bob Burn’s Bazooka and the Bazooka

It was during the first fights against the German troops in North Africa that the American troops could see the ease with which the German infantrymen were able to destroy or at least to put Allied tanks out of action without the support of their own artillery, using a projector that they carried with them almost everywhere. According to the observations made by the Americans on the battlefield, the power of the projectiles that issued this weapon and more particularly the ease with which the German infantrymen used it ignited a vivid interest for this kind of weapon. The capture of some exemplars of this German Panzerschreck was ordered for study. Some times later, these captured Panzerschrecks were sent to the USA and it didn’t take much time for the Ordnance to develop, test, and launch the mass production of what would henceforth bear the name of Bazooka, the Rocket Launcher 2-36 ‘(60-MM).

In June 1942, the US Army officially adopted the Launcher, Rocket, Antitank, M-1. General Electric built the first 5000 weapons in a crash program to equip Army troops for the North African campaign. When Soldiers first got their first look at the rocket launcher, they dubbed it ‘the bazooka’ after a musical instrument developed by entertainer Bob Burns. In June 1943, the 1st Corps (USMC) Experimental Rocket Platoon was formed with the mission of testing and evaluating the new bazooka. A detachment from the platoon participated in the Choiseul diversion with the 2nd Parachute Battalion from Oct 28 to Nov 3 1943.

M-1 & M-1A-1 Rocket Launcher 2’36 (60-MM)
This was the first time Marines used the bazooka in combat. A detachment for the experimental rocket platoon went in with the Marine forces during the Bougainville operation in October 1943. The official history made note of this deployment – The 2.36-inch antitank bazooka was used on enemy emplacements on Hellzapoppin Ridge, but the crews were unable to get close enough for effective work. In the Pacific, Marines encountered many problems with the new bazookas.
The battery-operated firing circuit was delicate and the rocket motors often failed because of high temperatures and humidity. But the weapon showed promise as a bunker buster for the infantry Marine. Lessons learned both in the Pacific and in North Africa were used to develop and field an improved version—the M-1A1 bazooka. New rockets were also fielded. These had improved motors that were less prone to failure due to environmental factors.
By mid-1944, the bazooka was in general service in the Fleet Marine Force. The F-series Table of Organization, effective from May 5, 1944, authorized 172 bazookas in the Marine division. Each of the division’s three infantry regiments was equipped with 43 bazookas; 16 in the regimental weapons company, and nine in each of the infantry battalions.
The rifle company had three bazookas under the F-10 Table of Organization. These weapons were assigned to the headquarters section and under the TO, did not have assigned bazooka men. Instead, the weapons could be issued as the company commander saw fit based on the tactical situation.

M-9 Rocket Launcher 2’36 (60-MM)
The first widespread use of the bazooka in combat was during the Marianas campaigns in the summer of 1944. They proved extremely effective against Japanese field fortifications and tanks. For example, early in the morning of Jun 17, 1944, the enemy launched a tank attack with infantry support against the 2nd Marine Division on Saipan.

About thirty tanks crashed into the Sixth Marine Regiment’s defensive positions. Bazooka teams hunted Japanese tanks in this intense, close quarter fight. The bazooka teams usually won, for Japanese tanks are weak.

In October 1943, the Ordnance Department adopted a new model of bazooka, the M-9 & M-9A-1. This new launcher incorporated many improvements over earlier models. A trigger operated magneto replaced the battery ignition system and a safety switch made the new model much safer. The tube could be broken down for easier carrying, an important consideration for the infantry Marine. New, more reliable rockets were also introduced. In a global war with competing demands and priorities, it was many months before the M-9 reached the Fleet Marine Force. These weapons were used in combat in the final campaigns of the Pacific war on Iwo Jima and Okinawa. Once again, bazookas were frequently employed to knock out reinforced defensive positions.
The bazooka’s main ammunition was a high explosive antitank round. The M-6 HEAT (High Explosive Anti Tank) rocket was standardized as the primary round in 1944. An earlier version—the M-6 HEAT rocket remained in service throughout the war. A practice rocket was also available. Late in the war, the M-10 white phosphorous smoke rocket was fielded, but this round did not see widespread combat use.

During World War II, almost 500.000 bazookas were produced to meet the demands of American and Allied forces. Although the 2.36-inch bazooka was a capable tank killer against Japanese armor, the same was not true in Europe. German tanks proved much harder to kill with bazookas. In late 1944, the Army Ordnance Department began work on a new, larger rocket launcher based on the M-9-A1. This weapon, the M-20 ‘Super Bazooka’ did not enter service until after the war was over. The M-20 would see combat service with Marines in Korea and other wars.

Bougainville

On Nov 1, 1943, the 3d Marines and the 9th Marines, assisted by the 2d Raider Battalion, seized a swath of Bougainville’s coast from Cape Torokina to the northwest. At the same time, elements of the 3d Raider Battalion assaulted Puruata Island just off the cape. The single Japanese company and one 75-MM gun defending the area gave a good account of themselves until overwhelmed by the invasion force.

Over the next several days the Marines advanced inland to extend their perimeter. There were occasional engagements with small enemy patrols, but the greatest resistance during this period came from the terrain, which consisted largely of swampland and dense jungle beginning just behind the beach. The thing most Marines remembered about Bougainville was the deep, sucking mud that seemed to cover everything not already underwater.

Japanese resistance stiffened as they moved troops to the area on foot and by barge. The Marines fought several tough battles in mid-November and suffered significant casualties trying to move forward through the thick vegetation, which concealed Japanese defensive positions until the Marines were just a few feet away. Heavy rains and the ever-present mud made logistics a nightmare and quickly exhausted the troops. Nevertheless, the perimeter continued to expand as 1-MAC sought an area large enough to protect the future airfields from enemy interference.

By Nov 20, 1-MAC had all of the 3d Marine Division and the 37th Infantry Division, plus the 2d Raider Regiment, on the island. In accordance with the original plan, corps headquarters arranged for the parachute regiment to come forward in echelon from Vella Lavella and assume its role as the reserve force.

The 1st Parachute Battalion embarked on board ships on Nov 22 and arrived at Bougainville the next day, where it joined the raider regiment in reserve. The corps planners wanted to make aggressive use of the reserve force. In addition to assigning it the normal roles of reinforcing or counterattacking, 1-MAC ordered its reserve to be prepared: ‘to engage in land or water-borne raider type operations’.

By Nov 26, the corps had established a defensible beachhead and enemy activity was at a low ebb. However, the Japanese 23d Infantry Regiment occupied high ground to the northeast of the US perimeter and remained a threat. Enemy medium artillery also periodically shelled rear areas. To prevent the Japanese from gathering strength with impunity, 1-MAC decided to establish a force in the enemy rear from whence it could: ‘conduct raids along the coast and inland to the main east-west trail; destroy Japs installations, supplies, with particular attention to disrupting Jap communications and artillery’.

The plan called for Maj Richard Fagan’s 1st Parachute Battalion, Mike Co of the raiders, and artillery forward observers to land 10 miles to the east, near of Koiari prior to dark on Nov 28. The raiders would secure the patrol base while the parachutists conducted offensive operations. They would remain there until corps ordered them to withdraw.

A Japanese air attack and problems with the boat pool delayed the operation for 24 hours. Just after midnight on Nov 28, the 739 men of the reinforced battalion embarked on landing craft near Cape Torokina and headed down the coast.
The main body of the parachute battalion went ashore at their assigned objective, but Mike Co and the parachute headquarters company landed nearly 1000 yards farther to the east. Much to the surprise of the first paratroopers coming off the boats, a Japanese officer walked onto the beach and attempted to engage them in conversation. That bizarre incident made some sense when the Marines discovered that they had landed in the midst of a large enemy supply dump.
The Japanese leader must have thought that these were his own craft delivering or picking up supplies. In any case, the equally surprised enemy put up little opposition to the Marine incursion.
Maj Fagan, located with the main body, was concerned about the separation of his unit and felt that the Japanese force in the vicinity of the dump was probably much bigger than his own. Given those factors, he quickly established a tight perimeter defense about 350 yards in width and just 180 yards inland.

By daylight, the Japanese had recovered from their shock and begun to respond aggressively to the threat in their rear area. They brought to bear the continuous fire from 90-MM mortars, knee-mortars, machine guns, and rifles; the volume of fire increased as the day wore on.

Periodically infantry rushed the Marine lines. The picture improved somewhat by 0930 when the body of raiders and headquarters personnel moved down the beach and fought their way into the battalion perimeter. Something to note also is that the battalion’s radio set malfunctioned about this time, and Fagan could not receive messages from 1-MAC. For the moment he could still send messages out, but was unsure if the corps headquarters heard them. Fortunatelly, the artillery spotters could talk to thebatteries, though, and they fed a steady diet of 155-MM shells to the Japanese. Unbeknown to Fagan, the raider company had its own radio and maintained independent contact with the corps. These communication snafus would lead to great confusion. By late morning, 1-MAC already was thinking in terms of pulling out the beleaguered force. At 1128, it arranged to boat of the 3d Marine Division half-tracks (mounting 75-MM guns) to assist in covering a withdrawal. Staffers also called in planes to provide close air support. Around noon Fagan sent a message requesting evacuation and corps decided to abort the mission. It radioed the battalion at 1318 with information concerning the planned withdrawal, but the paratroopers did not get the word. As a consequence, Fagan sent more messages asking for boats and a resupply of ammunition, which was running low. For some reason, neither Fagan nor corps headquarters used the artillery net for messages other than calls for fire support. While sending other traffic would have been a violation of standard procedures, it certainly was justified under the circumstances. After the operation was over, Fagan would express dismay that Mike Co radio operators, without his knowledge or approval, had sent their own pleas for boats and ammunition throughout the afternoon.

At 1600, the landing craft arrived off the beach and made a run in to pick up the raid force. The Japanese focused their mortar fire on the boats and the sailors backed off. They tried again almost immediately but again drew back due to the intense bombardment from the beach. Things looked bleak as the onset of night reduced visibility to zero in the dense jungle and increased the likelihood of a strong enemy counterattack. Ammunition stocks were dwindling rapidly and weapons failed due to heavy firing and the accumulation of gritty sand. Marines resorted to employing Japanese weapons, to include a small field piece. Three destroyers, the USS Fullam (DD-474), the USS Lansdowne (DD-486) and the USS Lardner (DD-487) accompanied by two LCI gunboats came on the scene after 1800 and turned the tide. The heavy fires at a short range of the Lansdowne and the LCIs soon silenced most of the Japanese mortars and boats were able to reach the shore unmolested about 1920. American artillery also continued to rain down around the perimeter. The parachutists and raiders exhibited a cool discipline, slowly collapsing their perimeter into the beach and conducting an orderly backload. After a thorough search to ensure that no one remained behind, the final few Marines stepped onto the last wave of landing craft and pulled out to sea at 2100.

The raid might be counted a failure since it did not go according to plan, but it did achieve some positive things. The day of fighting in the midst of the enemy supply dump destroyed considerable stocks of ammunition, food, and medical supplies. Rough estimates placed Japanese casualties at nearly 300 dead and wounded, though there was no way to confirm whether this figure was high or low. Undoubtedly the aggressive operation behind the lines caused the enemy to worry that the Americans might repeat the tactic elsewhere with better luck.

The Marine force attained these ends at considerable cost. Total casualties were 17 dead, 7 missing, and 97 wounded (two-thirds of them requiring evacuation). In one day of fighting the parachute battalion lost nearly 20 percent of its strength, as well as many weapons and individual items of equipment. The unit was not shaken, but it was severely bruised. While the 1st Battalion prepared for its trial by fire at Koiari, the rest of the regiment temporarily enjoyed a morale-boosting turkey dinner on Thanksgiving Day. (Many of the paratroopers awoke that night with a severe case of diarrhea, probably induced by some part of the meal that had gone bad). On Dec 3, the regimental headquarters, the weapons company, and the 3d Battalion embarked on five LCIs and joined a small convoy headed for Bougainville. The regiment received its first taste of action that evening when Japanese aircraft attacked at sundown. Accompanying destroyers downed three of the interlopers in a short but hot fight and the ships sailed on unharmed. The convoy deposited the parachutists in the Empress Augusta Bay perimeter the next day and they went into bivouac adjacent to the 1st Battalion. They did not have to wait long for their next fight.
Early December recon by the 3d Marine Division indicated that the Japanese were not occupying the high ground on the west side of the Torokina River, just to the east of the perimeter. The division commander decided to expand his holdings to include this key terrain, but the difficulty of supplying large forces in forwarding areas deterred him from immediately moving his entire line forward. His solution was the creation of strong outposts to hold the ground until engineers cut the necessary roads.

On Dec 5, corps attached the parachute regiment (less the 1st and 2d Battalions) to the 3d Marines Division, which ordered this fresh force to occupy and defend Hill 1000, while other elements of the division out posted other high ground nearby. To accomplish the mission, Col Williams decided to turn his rump regiment into two battalions by creating a provisional force consisting of the weapons company, headquarters personnel, and the 3d Battalion’s Item Co. The paratroopers moved out on foot from their bivouac at 1130 with three days of rations and a unit of fire in their packs. By 1800 they were in a perimeter defense around the peak of Hill 1000, 3d Battalion (less Item Co) on the south and the provisional unit to the north. Supply proved to be the first difficulty, as ‘steep slopes, overgrown trails, and deep mud’ hampered the work of carrying parties. The Division eventually had to resort to airdrops to overcome the problem. While some paratroopers labored to bring up food and ammunition, others patrolled the vicinity. Beginning on the 6th, the outpost line began to turn into a linear defense as the division fed more units forward. The small parachute regiment had a hard time trying to cover its 3000 yards of assigned frontage on top of the sprawling, ravine-pocked, jungle-covered hill mass.

On Dec 7, a 3d Battalion patrol discovered abandoned defensive positions on an eastern spur of Hill 1000. The unit brought back documents showing that a reinforced enemy company had set up a strong point on what would become known as Hellzapoppin Ridge. The battalion commander, Maj Vance, ordered two platoons of King Co to move forward to straighten the line. With no map and only vague directions as a guide, the unit could not find its objective in the dense jungle and remained out of touch until the next day.

That night a small Japanese patrol probed the lines of the regiment and the enemy re-occupied the position on the east spur. On the morning of Dec 8, a patrol from the provisional battalion investigated the spur and a Japanese platoon ambushed it. The paratroopers returned to friendly lines with one man missing. They reorganized and departed an hour later to search for him and tangled with the enemy in the same spot. This time they suffered eight wounded in a 20-minute firefight and withdrew. Twice during the day, the regiment received artillery and mortar fire, which is believed to be friendly in origin. The rounds knocked out the regimental command post’s telephone communications and caused five serious casualties in King Co. In light of the increasing enemy activity, Col Williams decided to straighten out his lines and establish physical contact between the flanks of the battalions. This required the right flank of Item Co and the left flank of King Co to advance.
On the morning of December 9, Maj Vance personally led a patrol to reconnoiter the new position. Eight Japanese manning three machine guns ambushed that force and it withdrew, leaving behind one man. At 1415, the left half of King Co attacked. Within 20 minutes, a strong Japanese rifle and machine-gun fire brought it to a halt. Although after-action reports from higher echelons later indicated only that Item Co did not move forward, those Marines fought hard that day and suffered casualties attempting to advance. Among others, the executive officer, Lt Milt Cunha, was killed in action and Sgt I. J. Fansler Jr had his rifle shot out of his hands.

The inability of Item Co to make progress enlarged the dangerous gap in the center of the regiment’s line. Vance ordered two demolition squads to refuse King’s left flank and Williams sent a platoon of headquarters personnel from the provisional battalion to fill in the remainder of the hole. Snipers infiltrated the Marine line and the regimental commander turned most of his command post group into a reserve force to backstop the rifle companies. The paratroopers called in artillery to King Co’s front and the Japanese fire finally began to slacken after 1615. The fighting was intense and King Co initially reported casualties of 36 wounded and 12 killed. That figure later proved too high, though exact losses in the attack were hard to ascertain since the paratroopers had 18 men missing and took casualties in other actions that day. Maj Vance suffered a gunshot wound in the foot and turned over the battalion to Torgerson. The executive officer of the 21st Marines was in the area, apparently reconnoitering prior to his regiment taking over that portion of the front the next day. He responded to a request for assistance and had his Charlie Co haul ammunition up to the paratroopers. When those Marines completed that task, he offered to have them bolster the parachute line and Williams accepted. For the rest of the night, the parachute regiment fired artillery missions at 15-minute intervals against likely enemy positions. The Japs responded with small arms fire. Division shifted the 1st Battalion, 9th Marines, to a reserve position behind Hill 1000 and placed the parachute regiment under the tactical control of the 9th Marines, scheduled to occupy the line on their left the next day.

That was not the only action for the paratroopers on Dec 9. That morning the provisional battalion had sent a platoon of Item Co reinforced by two weapons company machine gun squads on a patrol to circle the eastern spur and investigate the area between it and the Torokina River. The unit moved out to the northeast and reached the rear of Hellzapoppin Ridge, where it came upon two Japanese settings up a machine gun along the trail. The Marine point man observed the activity and alerted the patrol leader, Capt Jack Shedaker, who killed both in quick succession with his carbine. Unbeknown to the Marines, they were in the midst of a Japanese ambush and the enemy immediately returned fire from positions in a swamp on the left side of the trail.

The first burst of fire killed one Marine, but the parachute machine gunners quickly got their weapons in action and opened a heavy return fire into the swamp. While the tail end Marine squad tried to flank the enemy position, other paratroopers moved up onto the higher ground on the right side of the trail to obtain better fields of observation and fire. The Japanese soon withdrew under this withering response, but not without heavy losses since they had to cross open ground in full view of Marines on the slope above them. The patrol estimated that it killed 16 Japanese, though regiment later downgraded the claim to 12. The reinforced platoon retraced its steps to the Marine perimeter, its only loss being the one man killed at the start of the ambush. At least one other patrol made contact that day and one of its machine gun squads became separated in the fight.

A third patrol sent to search for the missing men came up empty-handed. Three of the machine gunners made it back to friendly lines the next day, but a lieutenant and three enlisted men remained missing.

The enemy continued to harass the paratroopers with small arms fire on the morning of Dec 10 and drove back a patrol sent out to recover Marine dead on Hellzapoppin Ridge. To deal with the problem, King and Love Cos withdrew 200 yards and called down a 45-minute artillery barrage. When they advanced to reoccupy their positions, they had to fight through Japanese soldiers who had moved closer to the Marine lines to avoid the artillery.

Later in the day, the 1st Battalion, 9th Marines, relieved the left of the parachute line and the 1st Battalion, 21st Marines, took over the right. Col Williams dissolved the provisional battalion and the rump regiment remained attached to the 9th Marines as its reserve force. Over the next few days, the paratroopers ran patrols and began building their portion of the corps reserve line of defense. The reserve mission was not entirely quiet, as the paratroopers suffered three casualties in a patrol contact and an air raid. Two machine gunners from the weapons company took matters into their own hands and went forward of the front lines searching for their comrades missing since Dec 9. Their unofficial heroics proved fruitless.

Meanwhile, the 21st Marines spent the period of Dec 12/18 reducing Hellzapoppin Ridge. Their efforts were successful only after corps supported them with a lavish outlay of aerial firepower (several hundred 100-pound bombs) and the dedicated assistance of a specially sited 155-MM artillery battery.
The Army’s XIV Corps headquarters relieved 1-MAC in command of the operation on Dec 15 and the Americal Division began replacing the 3d Marine Division on Dec 21. As part of this shift of forces, the regimental companies and 1st Battalion of the parachutists fell under Col Alan Shapley’s 2d Raider Regiment, with Col Williams assuming the billet of executive officer of the combined force. While the 3d Parachute Battalion continued as the reserve force for the 9th Marines, the raider and parachute regiment took over the front line positions of the 3d Marines on Dec 22. This placed them with their right flank on the sea at the eastern end of the Empress Augusta Bay perimeter. Army units relieved the 9th Marines on Christmas Day and the 3d Parachute Battalion departed Bougainville soon thereafter.
The 1st Battalion conducted aggressive patrols and made its only serious contact on Dec 28. Able Co crossed the Torokina River inland and swept down the far bank to the sea. Near the river mouth, it encountered a strong Japanese position and quickly reduced 8 pillboxes, killed 18 of the enemy, and drove off another 20 defenders. Three paratroopers died and two were wounded. Shapley joined the company to observe the final action and commended it for an ‘excellent job’. The last parachutists left Bougainville in the middle of Jan 1944 and sailed to Guadalcanal.

The Closing Shock

The final reevaluation of the parachute program began in Aug 1943. In a one-page memorandum, the Division of Plans and Policies summarized the heart of the problem. Simply put, there were far too few transport planes in the entire Marine Corps for the regiment to jump into combat, which was its only reason for existence. The Marine Corps either needed to acquire many more aircraft or borrow squadrons from another service. Left unstated was a third option to get out of the paratroop business. That already was nearly a foregone conclusion, since Gen Vandegrift was the Commandant-designate and he had pronounced views about the future of special units in the Corps. Holcomb set things in motion with a formal recommendation on Dec 21 to disband both the parachute and the raider organizations. However, he did so with the strong concurrence of Vandegrift, who actually presented the proposal in person to Adm Ernest J. King, the Chief of Naval Operations.
Col Omar T. Pfeiffer, the Marine planning officer on King’s staff, summarized the position of Holcomb and Vandegrift. Deletion of the parachute program would save $150.000 per month in jump pay, free 3000 personnel for assignment to one of the new divisions, allow for uniformity of equipment and training within all Marine infantry units, and ‘avoid setting up some organizations as elite or selected troops’. King agreed to the plan on Dec 25 1943. Except for a small cadre to provide an air delivery section for each of the two Marine corps-level headquarters in the Pacific, the 1st Parachute Regiment would return to the States and disband upon its arrival. Its manpower would form the core of the new 5th Marine Division. The 4th Battalion would disband at Pendleton and provide men for the general replacement pool.
Headquarters issued the official orders for this process on Dec 30. Vandegrift took the oath of office as the 18th Commandant of the Marine Corps on Jan 1 and one of his early official acts was ordering the closing of the Parachute Training School at Camp Gillespie. That personnel joined the 4th Battalion men in the replacement pool. The 2d Parachute Battalion sailed from Vella Lavella on Jan 2 to join the rest of the regiment on Guadalcanal. The 1st and 2d Battalions embarked for the States on Jan 18 and arrived in San Diego on Feb 4. The regimental headquarters and the 3d Battalion departed Guadalcanal on Jan 30. The 1st Parachute Regiment officially furled its colors on Feb 29, 1944. The 5th Marine Division, leavened by the veterans of the 1st Parachute Regiment, would land at Iwo Jima barely a year later and distinguish itself in that bitter fight. Three parachutists would participate in the famed flag raisings on Mount Suribachi on Feb 23 1945.

Sgt Henry 0. Hansen helped put the first flag in place, Cpl Ira H. Hayes and Cpl Harlon H. Block were among the group of six featured in the Joe Rosenthal photograph of the second flag-raising. Of the 81 Marines to earn the Medal of Honor in World War II, five were former paratroopers who performed their feats of heroism on Iwo Jima. Several Marine parachutists did put their special training to use in combat. A handful of graduates of the parachute program joined the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and jumped into occupied France in support of the resistance movement. Two officers participated as observers in an Army airborne assault in New Guinea. The Marine parachute units of World War II never jumped into combat, but they did make an indelible impression on the history of the Corps.

You should consider the advertizing bellow - It may save an entire life\'s souvenirs

I've been trying several systems for more than 15 years and you can belive me that there is no other way to support the European Center of Military History than this donation thingy. The quality of this website, the quality of the images, and all the rest, depend on you, and solely on you and it goes in the same exact way for the amount you plan to send. (NB) $5 is already perfect.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here